We can't do this on this post. It'll then spread to the whole site.
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
59 points (98.4% liked)
chapotraphouse
13473 readers
1 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Slippery slope you lose
Yea but that's just natural, so we should do it
Appeal to traditions you lose
Damnit my slippery slope bit flopped 
No I got it, sorry if that wasn't clear
But I feel like my naturalistic fallacy bit flopped for real 
Appeal to emotions you lose (I don't think I can keep this bit up how the heck do libs do it)
Argument from anecdote! Bulverism!
Getting opinions from sucking up the msm trash means spitting them back out is more of a pressure release than something they must struggle to maintain
Fallacy fallacy you lose
I just wanna say post hog ergo propter hog
False dilemma you lose
Strawman!
that's a nice fallacy fallacy. you posted an insult not an ad hominem
No true hexbear would do this.
no more half measures walter
Full Measure fallacy, you lose
Double Measure fallacy my good gentlesir
Updoots to the left
EDIT : Wow! I didn't expect this to be my most upvoted comment!
Edit: Thanks for giving 
money on my behalf kind stranger
I am a secret lib the way I like the response, "that's a good point, but what's your bench press?"
Just going to go around posting this at people:
That's actually what the redditors would like us to do
The real power move is telling them informal logical fallacies aren't real.
You dropped this 👑 .
The true essence of posting is to be as nerdily condescending as possible while offering literally no information. Bonus points for being casually wrong and making statements which can be ambiguously be taken as earnest or as facetious depending on what kind of response they get. Like so:
Something about your use of the word “fallacy” tells me that you are under the delusion that we live in a pre-Wittgenstein world. However, I am not a child and therefore have no interest in playing word games with you. Feel free to respond when you’ve gained the skill to frame your argument in such a way that it does not waste our time.
I got chills. This is really good
Libs cannot understand the difference between ad hominem and an insult
For reference.
Ad Hominem: You're stupid and so your argument is stupid
Insult: Your argument is stupid and so you're stupid.
Or also, Insult: your argument is stupid. On an unrelated note, you're stupid.
I will not allow this post to gaslight me
The concept of an 'informal fallacy' and its consequences have been a disaster for the human discourse.
Taps the sign
What happened at the end during the utterance of "oh fu-?"
Was it 
? 
pugnus ad hominem argument smh
Additionally, if anyone calls out a fallacy using its Latin name, bully them for being even more insufferable nerds for using Latin.
Uhh excuse me it's post hog poster ergo hog
What is latin for when you make them the 
?
I need to remember this. I just wasted whole minutes of my life arguing with a ~~Nazi~~ ~~lib~~ Nazi about the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact
Ok.
I call using "A factual error in the premises" since no one else has called that one yet.
That statement should be safe from infinite recursion when trying to use logical fallacies, right?