For issues concerning:
π©Ί This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.
See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)
Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.
Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content
Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!
While I'm in favor of adding a label, I don't think it would change much of anything. If you're really health conscious, you probably don't drink already and most other people would presumably say stuff like "everything causes cancer these days" or "my grandfather drinks daily and look how healthy he is".
If I remember correctly, even putting NSFW warning images on cigarettes didn't do much.
I'd much rather force manufacturers to use plain packaging (white label + black text in a standard font). Make it look as boring as possible with large warnings. Colors and branding have a very significant effect on sales - why else would labels have designs?
It will certainly also make it seem less normalized for children. Right now alcohol packaging is hardly distinct from some soft drinks.
Labels work, but they're not a cure-all.
Ask why police don't track the number of arrestees who are intoxicated. On the rare occasions (1998) it was tracked it was like 40%. And that's just alcohol.
sadf
Fun fact: while all the other packages have gory images on them, the "smoking causes impotence" ones show a floppy cigarette
I never questioned the effectiveness in terms of teaching the consumer. As I've said, I'm in favor of that and it's great.
However, people tend to continue their consumtion despite better knowledge. At least I remember this being the case with cigarettes. So it does almost nothing for the general health of your population. As others already mentioned, plain labels, a ban on marketing and similar actions are probably far more effective.
If the plan is disgusting shock images on anything, for any reason, fuck off.
Stop traumatizing people on purpose. A good cause is no excuse.
Hello
Hello, I would like a Δin and tonic please.
Certainly! Can I see some ID? And also please look at this picture of a diseased stomach for 5 seconds...
Fine. Can I have this box of about 20L of apple juice cartons and 5KG of honey? Oh yeah, and some yeast. Thanks.
Give it a few weeks to ferment and you have some way higher ABV hooch and at a fraction of the cost because you don't have to pay alcohol tax on it. I have almost thought about buying bulk apple juice but at around Β£400 for 1mΒ³ of it is a little much. I need to find more scrumpy drinkers first and we can pool our resources together.
Sir, this is a bar.
Why would you ruin perfectly good apple juice with alcohol.
Press apples and the juice will turn into cider from the natural yeast on the apples. The juice yearns to be cider.
Seems like a decent high-level overview, but would have appreciated some hard numbers and details to back it up. For example, what type of cancer does it typically cause? Esophageal? What is the prevalence on a population level?
Alcohol makes socializing for any length of time bearable. Warning labels won't change that.
How about instead of attacking stress relievers we attack sources of stress?