this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
1974 points (97.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

13438 readers
386 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 283 points 5 months ago (8 children)

If it would destroy the economy if everyone did it, then it should not be doable in the first place.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 5 months ago (3 children)

It's funny that one probably-landlord downvoted this. You know who you are, scum-sucking leech.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 145 points 5 months ago (2 children)

All so that none of their tenants can afford any of those four things without constantly struggling!

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 46 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's because they haven't seen that tweet from a money genius who invented the cheat code on life. You just need more money streams for more money. Who knew? Here I was, just sitting with a gazillian dollars stuffed under my mattress nor knowing what to do with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 92 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Step one: Have a shitton of money to buy property to rent out.
Oh, you don't have enough money? Hhm, have you tried not being poor?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 81 points 5 months ago (3 children)

They act like everyone could do this.

If everyone did this, the system would fail, because the profit here is scooped off the top with no actual production or service.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It would also require everyone to own 4+ houses which isn't exactly feasible

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 55 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Landlords don't contribute to society

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Quite the opposite in fact.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 51 points 5 months ago
[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 51 points 5 months ago

Groceries and vacations aren't even liabilities. Fella doesn't understand accounting well enough to fake use it properly.

[–] DistressedDad@lemmy.ca 46 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I know people like this. They truly believe like they are doing society a favor by buying up houses and renting them out. The disconnect from reality is wild.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's a little better than corporate real estate vultures though. If you think about it, these small landlords and renters are more alike than the people at Blackrock buying up all this shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JesterAUDHD@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I remember looking up just the air b&b’s in the Portland metro and there were over 4,000…..

A large majority of the rest were being rented.

The wealthy are buying it all with no regulation.

There should be one home per family in the suburbs. One vacation place and your house. No one needs 10 properties, get rich another way you greedy terrible fucks.

[–] stopdropandprole@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Rich people outbid regular folks for real resources (homes), taking away any chance at intergenerational wealth building. the only (legal) answer at the moment is taxation of the rich.

Gary Stevenson has some worthwhile insights on what we can do and how to convince working class people that the rich must be stopped or else your kids and grandkids will all be homeless renters.

inequality is sharply risinh all around the world. and it's getting worse. this is arguably the most important issue of our time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's simple to be successful:

  1. have rich parents that can give you money

  2. have easy access to loan programs because you're white and have rich parents

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thisfro@slrpnk.net 28 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I had to rant in a couple of comments because I drives me crazy when people defend leeching.

On a more constructive note: Housing cooperatives. I think they should be more widespread. Some people come together to build a house and then live in it for the cost it takes to actually support it. No crazy big apartments with a reasonable amount of people (roughly one bedroom per person), shared luxury such as gardens, in house shops, hell even a pool if you want. There is no leeching, just collective ownership.

[–] Zorg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Housing cooperatives (wiki) are quite great. Where I'm from they are rather common, but unfortunately the 'buy in' costs have increased a ton in the last couple decades. Even then, paying e.g. a third of what a comparable owner apartment costs, still makes it a lot more affordable for many people.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 5 months ago

Born on third base. Thinks they hit a triple.

[–] ShitposterSupreme@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

Well this is gross. Its extremely had to buy ONE property, to exist in, if you dont have Bank of Mom and Dad to rely on.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago (18 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

In a word, corruption.

In two words, legal corruption.

In three words, blatant legal corruption.

In four words, United States political system.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 42 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Meh.

  1. This isn't an America problem. People do this in every country

  2. This is capitalism not corruption

For everyone here's a fun thought experience. You have a room with 100 people. In that room is 100$. 1 person (Elon Musk let's say) holds 95$. 4 people (let's say various CEO class people) hold $1 each. The remaining 95 people share the remaining 1$.

And yet here we are all fighting because some of our deluded asses think we are going to be one of those 5 people one day.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 months ago (11 children)

Any reason why we can't just change the tax code to make this thing less viable? We disincentive things all the time. Like we can carve out exemptions for situations and things I'm sure but like, this shouldn't be how to run a society.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Any reason why we can't just change the tax code to make this thing less viable?

99% of state and federal level politicians are owned by these leeches and/or ARE these leeches.

In other words, almost all of the people with the power to do anything about it have a vested interest in NOT doing anything about it.

this shouldn't be how to run a society.

Ramen.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 18 points 5 months ago

Mooching off of others to fund your life style and giving nothing back in return

opens envelope

What's something considered classy if you're rich, but trashy if you're poor?

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

How does the second tenant pay their mortgage? One apartment's rent should not be enough to cover the mortgage of four (or five - including the one they live in). My guess is that they only payed all the mortgages for these four properties and this is about the mortgage of the apartment they live in.

The cheat code to a stress-free life is to own lots of real estate to being with.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Oh, some rents are getting crazy and the buildings were purchased 10-20 years ago so the mortgage isn’t that high. It’s all a scam.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 17 points 5 months ago (3 children)

i've literally paid more in rent for my small apartment than the entire (5 unit) building is worth. i crossed that threshold years ago.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Newsteinleo 16 points 5 months ago

I worked in the rental industry for a minuet, and I left because the people in the industry do not think of their renters as people. To property owners, renters are objects that you put in a property to make the property generate money.

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

For the SUM of your tenants' rent to pay for your mortgage and most of the upkeep? Probably fair.

For ONE tenant to cover the whole mortgage? Geez, that's not nice, to put it softly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Here's a tip poor people; just have money!

[–] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

Same people will be looking for a govt bailout when the real estate market collapses.

load more comments
view more: next ›