this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
97 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39834 readers
247 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Mussolini would be proud. His teachings are being followed a hundred years after he wrote the book on this topic.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Trump says a lot of things that, if taken in a certain light, can be NCII. Might be a good idea to flag his posts on all platforms so that they can be further investigated by those platforms if this passes.

All with the goal to keep NCII off the internet, of course.

[–] PopeRigby@beehaw.org 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

From the article:

While the bill is meant to address a serious problem—the distribution of non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII)

[–] PopeRigby@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago

Ah, must have missed that. Thanks.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How can the imagery be intimate if it's non-consensual?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Revenge porn