this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
469 points (98.8% liked)

Europe

6957 readers
1164 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 89 points 5 months ago (2 children)

As someone who grew up during the height of the Cold War, it's hard to describe how shocking a statement like this is. The US spent trillions of dollars to prevent something like this from happening to anyone in the government, to have the president compromised laughs in the face of all that.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Don't say they didn't warn you.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 5 months ago

History books are full of stuff like this - it just takes a long time of sustained effort, longer than a single generation.

[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Reagan is spinning in his grave.

[–] Darkenfolk@dormi.zone 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hook him up tot a generator and solve the energy crisis.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He'd just spin even faster knowing that.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Infinite energy glitch

[–] intelisense@lemm.ee 17 points 5 months ago

It was Reagan where things started going off the rails, ironically.

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 81 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I mean, he basically was last time. So…yeah.

Nothing the GOP is doing right now helps the United States.

Just have to ask “who does it help?” And the answer over and over is: Russia.

Edit: Maddow did a piece saying this exact thing (which was the impetus for my post initially). And I know WE all know that, but I hope more on air personalities keep saying it.

https://youtu.be/Zn9BTALjtLY

[–] HairyHarry@lemmy.world 53 points 5 months ago (1 children)
  • Destroying the economy of the USA: check
  • Deviding the country: check
  • Supporting rather Russia than Ukraine: check
  • Weakening the EU: check

Have I forgotten something?

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 56 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] HairyHarry@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Good point, I add:

  • flirting with Nord Stream 2
[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] federalreverse@feddit.org 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 months ago

Thank you

In this way, according to the calculation, Americans would regulate the German gas tap and earn money at the same time,” Bild wrote, noting that the U.S. government itself would not be directly involved

Grenell was an asshole meddling to much with German Politics as an ambassador back then, and I hope my Government will not participate in such a stupid deal where Energy Security is dependent on both Putlers and Musk's Goodwill

[–] federalreverse@feddit.org 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There is a second angle to all of it, and that's the Elon Musk/Peter Thiel/JD Vance angle, which also appears to be aimed at imploding the US but the goal there is privatizing government rather than helping foreign nations.

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's a good point.

They want to help Russia but also line their pockets along the way.

100%.

[–] federalreverse@feddit.org 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Afaiu, they don't give a hoot about Russia, they just see the US as "declining" and thus want the US to end as quickly as possible, so they can privatize the remains for their own benefit.

[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.org 3 points 5 months ago

Actually there's more to it than just their own benefit, and it's far more dangerous.

It's about saving the world by destroying it. There is this strange movement called accelerationism, basically the idea that tiday's world is doomed and we should speed up it's destruction to trigger {the rapture,world revolution leading to communism,settling Mars,alien intervention}.

[–] blinky@programming.dev 59 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Three separate former KGB agents all attest that he is indeed a Russian asset. They didn’t provide evidence, but I believe them.

https://thehill.com/opinion/international/5162890-assessing-new-allegations-that-trump-was-recruited-by-the-kgb/

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 16 points 5 months ago

Also the Kushner and Flynn stuff. Literally wanted a back channel to communicate with russia but whatever. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Links_between_Trump_associates_and_Russian_officials

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 29 points 5 months ago

Commenting on developments, Stuart posted to [Twitter]: “We have to consider the possibility that president Trump is a Russian asset.

“If so, Trump’s acquisition is the crowning achievement of [Vladimir] Putin’s FSB career — and Europe is on its own.”

I can't believe I'm agreeing with a Tory, a former Tory minister at that. We really are in the worst timeline

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Lol the "possibility"? Listen here, fuckwad... He is. That's coming from an American. Trump is 100% a Russian asset.

Welcome to our hell. Stop relying on us until he's been removed from office.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world -5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Just because he acts like it and you think he is doesn't mean he is a Russian asset. You need to back that kind of claim up.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

Lol "Sure, he walks like a duck, and he shits like a duck, and he *looks" like a duck... But where is the evidence?"

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

cause he acts like it and you think he is doesn’t mean he is a

Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck,....

Whether or not he is, stops mattering if everything he does can be understood and makes sense if he is.

Edit: I shouldn't say everything. A part of it can be explained by a mental impediment, and/or dementia. A separate part by narcissism and self interests. But the rest, my my, what a treat Trump is for each and every geopolitical enemy of the US.

[–] loosegoose@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Look at who has been funding him since he went bankrupt for the 5th time. It's obvious

[–] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

What kind of evidence do you have that he's a Russian asset?

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Keir Starmer has attempted to act as a bridge between the United States and Europe, having hosting a summit of nineteen leaders, including EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and Nato chief Mark Rutte, on Sunday.

Addressing MPs yesterday, the prime minister insisted the UK government will not “choose between” the US and Europe, as it attempts to secure a lasting, sustainable peace in Ukraine.

Starmer said: “I do want to be crystal clear. We must strengthen our relationship with America for our security, for our technology, for our trade and investment.”

That all sounds very unwise. I hope that behind the scenes the UK Government is less deluded.

[–] Palerider@feddit.uk 6 points 5 months ago

As a Brit I'd be surprised if they were that deluded, the more pertinent question to ask should be is the USA government that deluded?

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

The words don't match the whispers

[–] benjhm@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 months ago

I suppose they try to buy some time, to get out of the mess that much of UK security info and equipment is closely dependent on US. But indeed at such a pivotal moment, when there even seems to be cross party consensus, it's daft to miss the chance to re-orient towards Europe.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

No fucking shit! And it's the entire globe that needs the KY Jelly.

[–] Tarogar@feddit.org 5 points 5 months ago

You don't say...

[–] Martj9@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Good morning princess Stuart!

[–] federalreverse@feddit.org 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Your sarcasm that appears to indicate Mr Stuart is one of the last to realize — it may be a little misplaced, given that Starmer and Labour have apparently not awoken yet.

Also: happy cake day!

[–] Martj9@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

It's frustrating that maybe little by little someone is starting to consider this, after all Trump has done so far. But yes at least mr Stuart said it, I'm wrong. Everywhere there's a strong imvincible will to close eyes and hope that somehow the war will close itself doing minimum effort possible, and after that business as usual. No country take it seriously, unless it's too late. They're always one step behind. The smartest understood after a month or more of Trump's historical disasters.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 4 points 5 months ago

Senior Conservative MP says ~~UK must consider possibility~~ ‘Trump is a Russian asset’ - Politics.co.uk

Fixed that for you.

[–] 79luca79@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

na hes retarded all by himself xD no help needed