this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
530 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

73939 readers
4879 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] ninjaturtle@lemmy.today 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Have to keep things offline and outdated nowadays ๐Ÿซค to prevent things like this happening.

[โ€“] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Honestly, that's not a terrible idea in general. Like, if you have an Internet-connected device, you have a hook onto your network that someone can exploit down the line, including -- as Rossman points out -- making it function differently than it did at the time of your purchase in ways that you may not like. And even if you trust the manufacturer, that doesn't mean that someone cannot acquire them and then exploit that hook.

Kind of a problem with apps and other software too. Even open-source software, like the xz attack -- the xz package itself was fine, but you had someone, probably a country, intentionally target and try to seize control of an open-source project to exploit the trust that the open-source project had built up. I understand that it's also been a concern with even browser extensions.

The right to push updates to an Internet-connected device, unfortunately, has value. And there are people who will try to figure out ways to take advantage of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] ApollosArrow@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Old printers on ebay are going to be the new game, until we start seeing kickstarter flooded with new printer companies.

[โ€“] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I want to agree, but has there ever been a case of the free market saving itself?

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] St0ner@lemmy.wtf 11 points 5 months ago

enshitification of technological things continues..

[โ€“] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 10 points 5 months ago

The last bid I reviewed for a new office recommended Brother printers (woot) but the color laser had toner lock-in. I recommended an alternative and the owner agreed.

Too bad these companies won't know about the products they don't sell because of this crap.

[โ€“] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 months ago

Welp, I guess that pen plotter I built last year is going to be my full time printer

[โ€“] Opisek@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Not sure if I got the update yet, but I'm banning my printer from accessing the internet right now.

[โ€“] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I have a Brother MFC-9340CDW that I salvaged from work last year; we replaced it because it kept getting a ghost "paper jam" every time you tried to print something. Turns out the cause is an $18 board that's known to fail. Scanner still works fine though, strangely.

I also have a Kyocera FS-3900DN b&w laser printer from 2006...or somewhere around there. It does the thing, and can even be managed with a CUPS server since it has 10/100 networking.

Now to figure out how to disable automatic firmware updates on the Brother ๐Ÿค”

[โ€“] warm@kbin.earth 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Are there actually any good printers? I would pay more for the printer itself if you just don't try and scam me afterwards. It feels like a hopeless space.

[โ€“] qupada@fedia.io 4 points 5 months ago

You might have to consider buying used.

Even older HP printers are fine (and I know people love to shit on them, but they too used to be perfectly safe and reasonable choices). More or less the safe/unsafe divide coincides with the switch from printers with 2x16 character displays to ones with full colour screens.

I've got a 2012-designed (but mine is 2017-built) HP Colour Laserjet CP5225dn, it has none of the modern lock-in shenanigans.

Just gotta find one that's new enough that consumables are still readily available (fortunately this usually isn't too difficult), and in good physical condition.

[โ€“] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I've always promoted commercial inktank printers for people who do a lot of printing, and people always mentioned Brother as a response, but tbh I've never really hopped on the bandwagon to shill for any particular company.

Just a good commercial inktank printer. A regular printer with all the bells and whistles is going to cost you like $100 and $45 for each ink pack you buy, you might as well just spend $450 on a printer, write it off as home office expense, and call it good.

[โ€“] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I heard Brother was good, then I spent way too long formatting different USB sticks in different cluster sizes and formats, and never got ours to work with any of them. Don't buy Brother if you want that feature, either.

[โ€“] alphapuggle@programming.dev 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

FYI an MBR table with a fat32 partition is probably what it was looking for. If that doesn't work odds are the port is broken

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 5 months ago

I didn't even know he had a brother.

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ