Nothing wrong with being prepared.
World News
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
For US News, see the US News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
So once war starts there is nowhere to flee because Russia will need to bombard all the civilian infrastructure first?
I don't have a better suggestion but it sounds kind of off.
Russia bombards all the civilian infra immediately anyways, because it creates a crisis that the defenders have to manage. It's better to have a your defensive forces close to your civilian populace, than having to fly over to them once the attack has already started.
Remember, day 1 of the current Russian invasion, they tried to seize Kyiv airport, to bring in transport planes. The civilian airports are strategic targets even without any military presence.
This is what Switzerland does. Saves a ton of money on infra and maintenance costs, and keeps your defensive forces closer to the cities that enemies will be attacking.
Yes, and what's even cooler, they've recently made it so the Swiss air force can now even operate outside of office hours! (A small oversight that only lasted a few decades)
Now we only need to figure out the logistics of keeping at least a few planes fully operational at all times.