this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
149 points (96.3% liked)

News

31410 readers
2446 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A coalition of local officials from across the country are calling on Congress to oppose proposed legislation that will allow an increase in the length and weight of large trucks traveling on commercial highways.

...

“Longer and heavier trucks would cause significantly more damage to our transportation infrastructure, costing us billions of dollars that local government budgets simply cannot afford, compromising the very routes that American motorists use every day.”

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I seem to recall a news story in the 80s (maybe 20/20?) about how dangerous double and triple trailer trucks were on the highway. I guess the industry thinks it’s been long enough to try pushing for this again.

[–] bobman@unilem.org 7 points 2 years ago

I guess the industry thinks it’s been long enough to try pushing for this again.

Yeah, it's really sad how people are paid everyday to think of ways to cut corners and lower standards so rich people can make more money.

It never ends.

[–] exploding_whale@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Pretty sure doubles are legal in most states and triples are legal in a number of states as well. I don't see any length increase details in the article, though it does mention longer trucks. The only specific mentioned is higher gross weight.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Ahh man, I hope this gets passed through. The next step would be to restrict the speed of trucks on the highway and prevent trucks overtaking trucks.

After this I hope to see a greater implementation of cargo trains for large distances between distribution hubs, with small cargo trucks for the final leg.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, a lot of states have been changing the design truck from the federal standard to something heavier based on the traffic they are seeing. So, if the federal government is going to accept the heavier trucks, they are going to have to accept the affect these trucks have on the nation's highways.

Or just do what railroads did and design roads for the heaviest train of trucks full time forever, but that is kind of expensive and the federal government doesn't want to spend the money if they don't have to.

[–] geosoco@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Not just highways. Most of these are still going to travel on some locally maintained roads for at least some distance to drop off their goods. They should weigh less than 2 trucks, but will also potentially pack more weight into less space than 2 trucks (depending on loads).

What will this mean for red light durations and the yellow change phase? It takes a lot to slow these babies down.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 years ago

There may need to be a re-evaluation of stopping distances, but as strong distances haven't really been updated over time, I don't see that being a major issue.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I don't think it means anything different for traffic signals. The biggest trucks mostly stick to highways, even small state highways, that don't have many signals. And where they do, they're probably going up be going slow enough already that it's not going to make a difference.

[–] kiranraine@reddthat.com 5 points 2 years ago

Would think they'd invest in public transit, trains, and other stuff to lessen the burden on the road, but that's asking too much. Esp for people like me who are slowly losing the ability to want to drive despite the necessity. It's just rough being audhd let alone anything else where that causes issues but you can't get anywhere without driving or walking distances that just aren't possible bc sidewalks and other pedestrian friendly things don't exist now 😭

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Commercial highways is not a term I've heard before.