this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
976 points (98.4% liked)

News

36993 readers
1491 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago

"When they came for me, there was nobody left to help."

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Incels are finally having their moment. Next they will propose laws requiring hot girls to date them.

[–] Noved@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

Not date them, breed ala handmaids tale

[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Incels aren't getting shit out of this, this benefits rightwing patriarchs who have abused wives at home.

Incels are alone in a basement or some shit dreaming about being the rightwing patriarch but the rightwing patriarch doesn't likely feel anything but disgust for the incel. They'd purge the incel in a heartbeat if they could.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 17 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Ok so

As a single WASP (ok well, I grew up protestant) male in my 30s, who has the confidence of an abandoned kitten, how exactly does this benefit me?

Like I feel like this is supposed to be about men like me getting more power over women. But I fail to see how that helps me at all.

All I can see is that they start here, remove voting rights next, then they remove the ability for women to be licensed to be doctors, or lawyers, dentists, etc. That's gonna fuck my life up immensely.

Just so women can't have a say? Why?

Conservative views on women are absolutely confusing. I know we have to abandon logic with them, but maybe that's the part I don't understand: how the fuck do I think without logic?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 21 points 1 year ago

That's the thing: it isn't. The patriarchy is bad for 95% of men, as well, but a huge chunk of those believe it's good for them because at least they're not a woman.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

When are they going to start coming for the black folks so we can watch Clarence Thomas squirm?

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Maybe he'll get fired for being a DEI justice. I honestly don't want whatever would replace him tho.

You mean so we can watch him vote yes on it?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Once they run out of other others.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not from the US: What happened to Katie Britt, who gave her response to Biden's State of the Union address from her kitchen? Is she happy now? I mean, not that I wanted to criticize anyone, but that was totally obvious even before the election.

[–] CompleteUnknown@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, no, no. She's not one of those women, you see. That's for the other women.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is there a meme of Margaret Atwood looking horrified yet? Because there should be.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yarr@feddit.nl 14 points 1 year ago

Can't wait to see all the videos of right-wing women surprised: "What?!! No one told us he was going to do this! We thought when he said he hated women he was only trolling/owning the libs/joking around!"

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I mean, a major problem in society is that two incomes are required to pay off a mortgage - and making one member of that equation unable to work society wide would solve that, leading to mortgages and hence housing price calibration (calibrating it to a single wage income)....

...but I was kind of hoping that wouldn't be a product of gender segregation. Also this seems like it's going to affect a lot of other things and people women's autonomy and hence freedom and safety in jeopardy.

No Bueno.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Realistically, the loss of women's income would lead to a housing crisis as millions of families are unable to pay their mortgage, but it's naive to think housing prices will plummet. Plenty of vulture capital firms and the like will happily scoop those houses up to rent back to us in perpetuity.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is some phrase involving (symbolic) intercourse and uncovering knowledge describing the sequence of events rather well. What was it again? Have sex and be enlightened? 🤔

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›