this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
126 points (93.8% liked)

Political Memes

9200 readers
2428 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dditty@lemm.ee 53 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For anyone unaware, the Washington Examiner is biased pretty strongly to the right

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/

Just including in case it wasn't obvious based off of the ridiculous article pictured

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I would have posted a screen clip of it climbing to the top of r/conservative but, as I've been criticized for it before, they don't need any publicity.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 19 points 5 months ago

lol whole fricking concept of court packign is just to try and counteract the plays already done.

IE the fact that trump was given as many nominations in 4 years, that Obama and Biden got in 12.

Which yeah does IMO kind of highlight the problem in the system in general. IE lifetime appointments are a variable that's already a bit broken. IE hypothetically if one party were trying to break the system, they could have ages ago by just intentionally having all of their members step down when their party is in power, ensuring that there is never a risk of a flip beyond an unexpected death.

But yes obviously progressive groups weren't subtle about the fact that flipping the SC is the reason to expand it. and again it's literally because it is feasible that as the rules of the game are apparent, if the court is never expanded, a conservative supermajority could be maintained indefinately even if republicans only win the presidency 1/4th of the time.

IE I would be very shocked it thomas and alito don't retire in trumps current term, and get replaced by young corrupt conservatives.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Except it's weaponized stupidity

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I dunno, they are trying really hard to weaponize the fact. r/conservative even jokes about packing it with more conservative judges. Except they are too stupid to realize that would be the worst move imaginable when you already have a majority. It would only open the door for dems to do it if they ever regained power, not that that's likely.

[–] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago

Conservatives are spineless fucks and usually pedophiles!

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Court packing was never a viable suggestion.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It also never happened and would have never happened under biden.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Is Lemmy committed to the trash headlines/sources such that we will become Reddit with a mere sliver of the membership?