this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
233 points (99.6% liked)

politics

25569 readers
2826 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump recently suggested the U.S. national debt might be inflated by fraudulent treasury payments, raising concerns among economists and financial experts.

Nobel laureate Paul Krugman warned that both Trump and Elon Musk have a history of not paying debts and that “if markets even suspect that this habit will extend to Treasuries, God help us.”

The White House quickly walked back Trump’s remarks, but the clarification seemed unconvincing.

Critics argue this incident shows Trump’s lack of understanding of financial and economic fundamentals.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 85 points 7 months ago (1 children)

King Trump does not understand the concept of paying debts, always equates it to being stolen from.

So ofcourse he will try to weasel himself out of paying debts, that he'll tank the US credibility on the financial markets will be declared someone else's fault.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

A trump never pays his debts.

Contrary to popular belief that's not actually house of trumps words. Their words are:

"I dont take responsibility at all."

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 59 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nobel laureate Paul Krugman warned that both Trump and Elon Musk have a history of not paying debts and that “if markets even suspect that this habit will extend to Treasuries, God help us.”

If any god were willing to help us a meteor would have taken out D.C. on inauguration day.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In his first term the sky turned blood red and rained ashes while a deadly plague ripped through the streets of America, you'd think the people looking for Messages from God might have taken the hint

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

I'm sure most of us have already seen this. But it feels relevant here. And maybe it'll be someone's first time.

https://www.benjaminlcorey.com/could-american-evangelicals-spot-the-antichrist-heres-the-biblical-predictions/

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 46 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I propose that the White House be the president, instead of Trump.

[–] cmoney@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago

I propose that the White House be the president, instead of ~~Trump~~ Elon.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I would vote for Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), if for no other reason than to hear reporters talk about the "Whitehouse White House".

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago

The archive page of that senator if he were president would be:

https://whitehousewhitehouse.archives.gov/ https://www.whitehouselibrary.gov/

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 29 points 7 months ago (1 children)

“We’re even looking at Treasuries,” the Republican said. “There could be a problem — you’ve been reading about that, with Treasuries and that could be an interesting problem.”

For some reason, the president went on to add, “It could be that a lot of those things don’t count. In other words, that some of that stuff that we’re finding is very fraudulent, therefore maybe we have less debt than we thought.”

His comments were, for all intents and purposes, gibberish. But more importantly, they were also potentially dangerous.

“For those not familiar with how financial markets work, US Treasuries are the ultimate safe asset, used as collateral for everything,” economist Paul Krugman explained. “Even a hint that some Treasuries might not be honored could bring everything to a screeching halt.”

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 17 points 7 months ago

Much of the economy only works because people believe in it. The UK had an economic crisis in 2022 when Liz Truss, Prime Minister for 50 days, passed a budget so terrible it tanked their stock market.

The budget included enormous tax cuts for the highest tax brackets, resulting in a £60 billion budget deficit, all while there was a cost of living crisis for the UK's poorest. UK stocks plummeted so much over the thought that the Prime Minster had no idea how to manage the economy that it caused "safe" investments, like retirement funds, to start failing. The UK central bank stepped in and said they'd print money in order to keep safe investments liquid which likely stopped the UK from experiencing a great depression. Liz Truss resigned because of the fallout.

It's not an exaggeration to say that Trump hinting that the government might not honour their debts could collapse the economy.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 22 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Critics argue this incident shows Trump’s lack of understanding fundamentals.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 12 points 7 months ago

How, how do you bankrupt a business whose whole model is: Person enters with money -> person leaves with no money.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This incident shows trumpi's fundamental lack of understanding. FTFY.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I included the big word at the end to confuse trump.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Tht could be 0n repeat the nex 4 years, like ly longer.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 13 points 7 months ago

I mean dude already trying to stop public debts which are supposed to be constitutionally protected. So not a surprise to see that.