this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
96 points (99.0% liked)

Ukraine

10594 readers
339 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Machine translation of video.

Speaking to an interviewer from Russian state media channel Россия 1, Col. Gen. Mordvichev says the quiet part out loud regarding the broader goals of Russian policy: namely that the ambition of conquering Ukraine is only a stepping stone to attacking the rest of Eastern Europe, a course of action which he presents as a necessity ("we will have to attack").

I would opine that statements like these, brazenly uttered to domestic mass media by a senior military figure, are indicative of the realities of Russian ambitions: to revive Russian imperial domination of Eastern Europe by force of arms.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They literally already failed step one of that plan. Does anyone actually think they can do what this guy is suggesting?

[–] Epilektoi_Hoplitai@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It seems implausible in the short term, but if statements like these are in any way reflective of long term strategic goals, or even official rhetoric, it's still ominous. Of course, given the fact it's state TV, it could be the General purely reciting the party line to give the public the impression that the war is going vastly better than it really is. But it also reminds me of what were purported to be strategic planning documents leaked by FSB sources early in the war, from when Russia still believed they'd take Kyiv in three days. It described a plan to conquer the country in weeks, then present their army on the Polish border as a fait accompli and declare a no-fly zone over the Baltics as an ultimatum to NATO.

Whether that's true or not, subsequent events showed that the ZSRF was incapable of even that plan, as you say. But the very level of disparity between nominal and actual capabilities that led Moscow to believe such a thing was possible to begin with certainly doesn't speak to their ability to make accurate estimations of what their forces are capable of.

[–] rastilin@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago

The way I see it is that the real problem is that they wanted to. Normal people don't want to kill their neighbors and take their things, even if they could. This also applies to most countries. The fact that the Russians are thinking about invading other European countries is a problem by itself.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No matter how the Ukraine war ends, Russia will find itself staring down the barrels of a lot of guns. All of Europe is now united against them (OK, there's Hungary, but they're at best an annoyance) and rearming like crazy. Russia, on the other hand, has shown just how weak it is and whatever strength they had is now squandered and will take decades to rebuild. Any threats they make should just be answered with "you and what army, Valodja?".

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Also Switzerland and Austria are happy to stand by and watch the genocide of their neighbors.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Russia is demanding a world war. Pre-emptive strikes on Russian assets is clearly justified right now.