It’s s actually a downgrade over fptp as it makes it harder for the independents/smaller parties to win seats.
Is there a mathematical explanation for why this is the case?
What is This Group is About?
De Quoi Parle ce Groupe?
The unofficial non-partisan Lemmy movement to bring proportional representation to all levels of government in Canada.
🗳️Voters deserve more choice and accountability from all politicians.
Le mouvement non officiel et non partisan de Lemmy visant à introduire la représentation proportionnelle à tous les niveaux de gouvernement au Canada.
🗳️Les électeurs méritent davantage de choix et de responsabilité de la part de tous les politiciens.
Related Communities/Communautés Associées
Resources/Ressources
Official Organizations/Organisations Officielles
We're looking for more moderators, especially those who are of French and indigenous identities.
Politiques de modération de contenu
Nous recherchons davantage de modérateurs, notamment ceux qui sont d'identité française et autochtone.
It’s s actually a downgrade over fptp as it makes it harder for the independents/smaller parties to win seats.
Is there a mathematical explanation for why this is the case?
I disagree with the notion that IRV is strictly "a downgrade" over FPTP.
Both FPTP and IRV are winner-take-all systems. However, IRV is superior to FPTP, as the spoiler effect is mitigated. We still have wasted votes in any winner-take-all system, but perhaps of varying degrees of severity.
However, proportional representation (e.g., STV or MMP) is the only way to guarantee fair representation for all.
Ranked choice is better than fptp, but not good enough. STAR voting is superior in every way, and actually accomplishes the goals of ranked choice voting.
Anyone opposing alternative voting options on principle doesn't have your best interest in mind.
The single transferable vote has the ranked voting without the disproportionate results