CDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more) : science

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago

Is there an equivalent to samizdat in scientific journals?

If so, our scientists should adopt some pseudonyms...

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How long until this evil administration forces some citizens to sew a yellow star or pink triangle on their clothes?

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 4 points 6 months ago

Yellow star is so last world war.

It’ll definitely be pink triangles and moon and star this go around

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

The GOP read the Bolshevik, CCP and Nazi playbooks.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Are you fucking kidding me?!?! What the fuck is wrong with that orange fucking clown? Jesus fuckjng christ.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

I really hope some people are archiving stuff as fast as possible...

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

times 3.12.23 reporting bb dayorder doubleplussungood refs unpersons rewrite fullwise upsub antefiling

In Oldspeak, this might be rendered:

CDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)

[–] commander@lemmings.world 6 points 6 months ago

Crazy how polticized science is.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Well now how will I explain that a pregnant dominant species member is not a Martian

[+] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

[deleted]

[–] iamtherealwalrus@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Source?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

On review I agree, we need better sources before we can be confident of this story.

Edit: It seems to be real.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/trump-cdc

[–] iamtherealwalrus@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Thank you. I'm surprised, this is the science community and I'm downvoted for asking for a source. I thought this community valued proof.

[+] prosp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com -16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 months ago

What kind of research do you have in mind? The phrase "research against" strikes me as a bit odd: it suggests research done with a preconceived conclusion in mind, whereas good scientific research tries to investigate a question neutrally and only conclude based on the evidence.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Examples?