this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
4 points (83.3% liked)

Flying

255 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss all things flight related.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But that was a publicly funded joint venture. The governments of the UK and France basically paid for development.

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Concorde : private companies funded by public money from France and UK -> Not privately developed

XB1 : private company funded by public money from Saudi Arabia -> privately developed

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

To be fair. There is a meaningful difference between venture capital and joint ventures.

Like the concord was amazing for its time. But we have to acknowledge the accomplishment here.

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely. It's technically very impressive.

But I wonder why the PR insists on the 'first private' thingy. I am not sure how it's relevant, seeing how the funding for these projects have changed in all these years.

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I think it’s because they reallly want to say “first!!” But have to add an adjective to be able to truthfully say it.