this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
384 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

78098 readers
2477 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aaron@lemm.ee 233 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 36 points 11 months ago

An irony curtain.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 164 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What, you mean like Microsoft, uh, OpenAI did?

[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 114 points 11 months ago

Yep, NOW it's a problem, though! Because it's someone else doing the same thing, someone who isn't part of the human centipede starting at Trump's colon.

[–] konomikitten@lemmy.blahaj.zone 144 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It’s no crime to steal from a thief.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago (3 children)

“You can’t steal that public data! We stole it first!”

And considering that’s exactly what Microsoft did to Apple with point and click, what irony!

[–] FartVentriloquist69@sh.itjust.works 30 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They both stole point and click from Xerox if my memory serves me correctly

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Apple did pay Xerox for it if I'm remembering right

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh really? **Rabbit hole unlocked

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFcb-XF1RPQ

The relevant part of Pirates of Silicon Valley. After which you should watch the whole thing. It’s fan fiction, but it’s the best explanation of what happened between Apple and Microsoft leading into the 1990s.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

What data? they one OpenAI illegally obtained first?!

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Somebody better call the WAHMBULANCE!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 35 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I’m sure now that OpenAI accuses DeepSeek of stealing they will now prove that they have rights to things that are being stolen, right? XD

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 34 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Are they worried that deepsink too stuff written by others, mixed it up, and repackaged it as it's own?

Well, yeah, that's all AI is. An expensive weighted pachinko machine, that uses human made content, and remixes it.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (13 children)

The question isn't whether they've used the same information. It's whether they've faked the process to achieve that 20x efficiency.

Look at it like a dictionary. Writing one from scratch is a huge task, no matter how many other books exist. How do you even go about finding all of the words?

But if other people have already written dictionaries, you can just use their word lists and go from there.

It's more efficient, but only because it's a completely different task.

load more comments (13 replies)

Is it worth it? Let me work it I put my thing down, flip it and reverse it

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago

Time to talk about data rights :)

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 27 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What’s the game plan if they did?

Trade restrictions?

China already proved those did fuck all to stop them from developing their own model.

Ducking knew this ai bubble would burst sooner or later, just glad we can finally get on with it now.

[–] Quexotic 5 points 11 months ago

I ducking knew it too, I've been a long for the ride though. The models still do have some niche applications where they're actually useful.

This whole thing with OpenAI and Microsoft whinging about fair play is truly laughable though. What clowns.

As a side note, it took a few tries to write ducking, my keyboard kept correcting it to fucking. We're definitely 2 different people. Lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lol its like fucking lavrov from fucking russia screaming "this is against international law" when Europe froze their assets.

[–] tux0r@feddit.org 24 points 11 months ago

So that means that Microsoft will pay compensation to us, right?

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Article from ft https://www.ft.com/content/a0dfedd1-5255-4fa9-8ccc-1fe01de87ea6

https://archive.is/D9whR

Looks like Microsoft is bracing for today’s earnings call

[–] Erasmus@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

If I stole from the thief, is it really stealing?

  • some Philosopher probably
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In Brazil, there's a rhymed saying: "ladrão que rouba ladrão tem 100 anos de perdão", it translates to "a thief that steals from a thief has 100 years of forgiveness"

[–] spirinolas@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

It's a common proverb in Portuguese, not just in Brazil.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

When a writer copies someone else's work without cites or compensation, it's called "plagiarism." But when an AI does it, it's called "LLM training."

[–] 01189998819991197253 17 points 11 months ago

Unless that AI is not OpenAI, then it's "plagiarism" still.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

When you can't beat em, sue em. It's the American way.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

"Tom, if irony was strawberries we'd all be drinking smoothies right now"

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 15 points 11 months ago

Microsoft Probing If DeepSeek-Linked Group Improperly Obtained data the same way OpenAI did. --FTFY

[–] Deepus@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck is Microsoft getting involved for?! Maybe concentrate on not providing shitty fucking software fuck heads!

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They have a large stake in OpenAI, last I checked.

[–] Deepus@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oh fair, i didnt know that. But still, fuck Microsoft.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 months ago

OMG Competition!

QUICK, they're a foreign threat! They're coming right for us!!!!

[–] spearz@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

"Waaaaah" you say?

load more comments
view more: next ›