this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
43 points (100.0% liked)

Archaeology

3483 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to c/Archaeology @ Mander.xyz!

Shovelbums welcome. 🗿


Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.


About

Archaeology or archeology[a] is the study of human activity through the recovery and analysis of material culture. The archaeological record consists of artifacts, architecture, biofacts or ecofacts, sites, and cultural landscapes.

Archaeology has various goals, which range from understanding culture history to reconstructing past lifeways to documenting and explaining changes in human societies through time.

The discipline involves surveying, excavation, and eventually analysis of data collected, to learn more about the past. In broad scope, archaeology relies on cross-disciplinary research. Read more...

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. No pseudoscience/pseudoarchaeology.



Links

Archaeology 101:

Get Involved:

University and Field Work:

Jobs and Career:

Professional Organisations:

FOSS Tools:

Datasets:

Fun:

Other Resources:



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes


Find us on Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fun facts from my zooarch days: if you shake a couple of these bones in your hands they sound like dice.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Anyone know where the site is? The article says “Ainabulak, [...] a village in the eastern part of the country”, but the only Ainabulak I can find is in western Kazakhstan.

EDIT: The referenced Astana Times article puts the find in the Zaisan district, near the Altai and Tarbagatai ranges. Which I guess would put it near the eastern edge of the Andronovo culture.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's already kind of iffy to assume religious significance to a find, but to assume function within a ritual? Those bones could be her collection of pretty bones for all we know. That's bad science journalism. I bet the archeologist got caught musing what could it mean and the writer simply cherry picked what they thought was most interesting.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

the writer simply cherry picked what they thought was most interesting

seems like that's a fair description of what all journalism ends up being, but most especially science journalism.. i hate trying to sift through articles for actual information on finds like this..

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Fun fact ~~from my zooarch days~~:

If you shake a bunch of these bones, that one colleague will start screaming at you.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Haha, my boss told me to check it out! 😅

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

One scale bar is enough, jeez.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Listen, it's not the size that counts, it's the amount of bones. 🎺