this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
506 points (98.7% liked)

tumblr

5127 readers
23 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 74 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I feel like this commonly used argument misses key context. There are numerous scenes where Clark disappears and then within literal seconds, Superman appears. Like yeah, the costume would totally work in instances where someone hadn't literally just seen Clark, but if I just saw that fucker a few seconds ago and then saw Superman, I'd definitely at least do a contemplative eye squint.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Only plausible because of Reeves' excellent acting. Like, yeah. That's 2 different people!

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Obviously superman is also a super actor, at least as good as Reeves.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think the actual reason is no one has any reason to think that superman is walking around with an alter ego, especially without an elaborate disguise. I mean he doesn't wear a mask like the psycho bat. so people even know superman has an alter ego?

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 48 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I present you Zooey Deschanel without bangs:

[–] 69420@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

Wow. She really looks like Zooey Deschanel without bangs.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Also, Zooey Deschanel has been pretending that she and Katy Perry are different people for years.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 3 points 7 months ago

Now that you mention it, I have never seen them in the same room together!

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Ok, I can't tell if this is real or not, and it's breaking me.

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why are they called bangs?

(Sorry -- I'm from the UK and I have literally never understood why they are called bangs. This seemed like a good time to ask).

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

it was originally a horse term for when they cut the tail. called "bang-tail"

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Cool.

At least I know now :)

Still weird.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 44 points 7 months ago

There's a scene from the comics where Supes is talking to this young guy who recently learned about the secret identity thing. The guy says "So, what, you can never take your glasses off in front of anyone?" Supes smiles at him and says "I take my glasses off all the time. You know what people say? 'Wow, you look just like Superman.'"

Basically, it's the Tony Hawks thing. People don't expect a guy as important as super man to just be some dude getting a coffee. It's more logical and more natural to assume that the guy who looks uncannily like Superman is just a guy who looks uncannily like Superman. That just makes more sense to people, so that's what they believe.

Also, this: https://youtube.com/shorts/nIFNhvv4Y4k

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The Clark Kent disguise would definitely fool most people that don't regularly interact with either of them.

The real dumb thing is it's portrayed as fooling people who have a close personal relationship with him in both forms and spend non negligible amounts of time around both Clark and Superman. Those people would quickly notice.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Except, the Clark Kent persona is portrayed as the kind of person no one sees even when they're talking to him.

He gets his work done well, but not so well as to stand out. He doesn't win awards or receive accolades. He never asks anyone to drop him off at the airport or help him move. He doesn't ever call out sick or do anything else that would draw attention. He doesn't get drunk at the office Christmas party. Automatically friend-zoned by every woman he meets, not because there's anything wrong with him, but just because there's nothing right about him. He's not the guy you ask out. He's the guy you ask to watch your cat so you can go on vacation with someone else. He's only noticed in his absence, and then he's quickly forgotten when he returns.

Lots of people like that are completely invisible.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Also, look how convincing Christopher Reeves makes this transformation by only taking off his glasses and shifting his posture. He doesn't even change his hair. I could definitely work with this guy and not realize he was Superman. https://youtu.be/BIaF0QKtY0c

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

I needed a movie to watch tonight.

1978s Superman it is :)

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Actually he parts his hair on the opposite side!

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough, but I meant that, specifically in that clip, he transforms from Clark to Superman and back to Clark purely through how he carries himself and a pair of glasses. It's just a single take where he takes off his glasses, stands up straight, and looks like a completely different person.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Reeves acting really shows out.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

That's not intentional. It just happens when you run through a revolving door really fast.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Parton and Chaplin, sure, but the other contests were for comic book heros that unless stated as part of the contest rules would not necessarily favor the films' character adaptations.

Which is to say Wolverine is canonically short.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Also the story about Chaplin is almost certainly made up.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Charlie chaplin lookalike contest sounds like a setup for a hitler joke.

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

People shouldn't make Hitler jokes. That sort of thing makes me Fuhrious.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Whenever someone makes one here I just pretend I did nazi it.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

one told him he was too tall

I mean, they weren't wrong.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

You have to remember that Ryan Reynolds is 7'3"

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wait, was Clark Kent the costume?

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well yeah, Superman is Superman, he just dons his Clark Kent costume when he wants to be inconspicuous. The superman suit is more of a uniform than a costume or disguise.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So when I was five years old on Halloween, I was just wearing some stupid uniform?

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

another is in spiderman far from home, mysterio appears throughout the film yet nobody noticed

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 1 points 7 months ago

In this particular case, the last bullet point could have been sufficient