Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Every judge who blocked this testing should be immediately disbarred.
I am also open to them spending 48 years in prison :3
This case sounds eerily similar to the case of Curtis Flowers, who spent 20+ years on death row for a quadruple-homicide in Mississippi. The DA and investigators just didn't want to do their jobs, so they pinned it on someone who they didn't expect to fight back, and they tried and convicted him 6 times instead of looking for the real culprit. In the Dark is an incredible podcast about it.
The state isn't just stealing the years these guys were locked up. They're stealing the years afterwards too. In Ziegler's case, he's never used a cell phone, never used the internet. There's no amount of money that would compensate for what they did to him.
He is still not free and there is no timeline to be freed :(
Officers or prosecutors withheld the existence of multiple witnesses and police reports, including one of an attempted armed robbery at a gas station across the street from the furniture store within hours of the murders. The original judge also behaved inappropriately, the lawyers say, getting a doctor to prescribe Valium to a holdout juror, who only then voted to convict.
Withholding evidence is not that uncommon, unfortunately, but it looks like it was especially bad in this case. And giving Valium to a juror is an egregious overreach. The full details of what happened are even worse than it sounds at first glance.
She was under a lot of pressure because she wanted to talk about the evidence and the other jurors didn't. They yelled at her and heckled her, basically, until she fainted. The judge finds out and says it's no problem. Defense lawyer asks for a mistrial, gets turned down. Juror says she doesn't need a doctor. Then the judge makes a phone call, in secret, and gets her doctor to give her Valium. Enough that the other jurors thought she was "floating."
The worst part is, the Florida supreme court saw no problem with that. They said it wasn't judicial misconduct, it was just the judge being concerned and looking out for her.
Thank you for this extra context. I already thought what was mentioned about the Valium was more egregious than the denied DNA testing. Realistically, it probably should have been declared a mistrial.
That said, there is very significant evidence that this guy did actually commit the murders. He certainly shouldn't have been denied DNA testing when requested decades later and I don't think the death penalty is an appropriate thing in society generally, but some of the details are very difficult to find another realistic theory to back.
The 58-year-old handyman who had been working for the in-laws for 20 years said Zeigler pointed a gun in his face when the two of them arrived at the store and tried to fire it several times but the gun jammed. That guy ended up getting the gun, running away, jumping a fence, hitching a ride, then showed up at the police station later that night to turn in the gun and report what happened.
Then the other guy, Mays, that Zeigler says was responsible and was found dead at the scene doesn't add up to being the killer either in my mind.
I think Zeigler had already killed his wife and in-laws. Perhaps the handyman was originally meant to be the patsy but had escaped when the gun jammed and then Zeigler called Mays to the store after that as a backup Patsy?
I obviously don't have all of the evidence, but if you read the details about the new DNA testing, they are a far cry from clear evidence that Zeigler didn't still kill his wife and in-laws. It was an extremely messy and complicated crime scene.