this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
494 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

73939 readers
4493 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CixoUwU@lemmy.cixoelectronic.pl 4 points 6 months ago

Yes, I also think that was bait, because ban started few days before begin of Trump term and ban was not really working. It had a lot of bugs, simple VPN could byoass it, "YES, user who logged in ONLY from USA and now loggin from Europ REALLY IS NOT AN AMERICAN NOW!!!". That two things make me to think it was a bait.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Can someone explain to me how they believe the Trump team convinced Biden to sign the ban?

If you think it was a stunt for the benefit of Trump, you’re implying the Biden admin was in on it. Doesn’t make sense to me. Seems the more likely scenario is Biden just royally fucked up again to the point of somehow making Trump look good.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago

I thought the stunt was on the part if TikTok. They shut down when they didn't have to and then came back on all chummy with Trump when he announced the 90 day extension. The play was to kiss Trump's ass. Biden signed it and they took advantage of the situation.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

If it's that problematic with propaganda then banning it after an election was a meaningless gesture. It served it's purpose and reversing the ban was simply transactional. They paid money and kissed the ring.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago

Tiktok is an app for stupid people so naturally stupid people would be more gullible.

[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

This man will always be a moron.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

While the whole situation is shitty, I find it hard to believe a massive company would shut down services for 12 hours, losing millions in revenue and likely millions of users, all as a PR stunt for a foreign leader.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

No, and that's an incredibly stupid premise. Trump wasn't the one to push the Ban. He wasn't the one to keep it going to completion, and he sure didn't PLAN on not having a second consecutive term. He's just following his most basic programming of If Biden did(Thing); Undo(Thing)

[–] twoface@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He was the one who initiated the ban...

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

So you would suggest that Trump initiated the ban just so he could block it at the last minute, in an effort to make himself look good? If the Donvict hadn't gotten himself thrown out of office and had been able to see if through, there is no reality in which he then overturns his own ban at the last moment. He purely and only overturned it here because it was not seen as something He did, but something Biden did.

The premise that Trump pulled a bait and switch, deliberately initiating the ban specifically so he could "look good" by overturning it is absolutely idiotic. He overturned it because Biden finished it, and "Undo Biden" is one of his overriding directives.

[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I really doubt it. Trump just did the obvious, grabbed the low hanging fruit, and contradicted the Biden administration because that’s all he can do. No conspiracy needed; that would afford trump forethought and cunning he isn’t capable of. He can’t think past his next Big Mac or tweet.

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 6 months ago

you underestimate too much. trump is just a face, there are plenty of people working with him and planning all kinds of shit. any kid plans some trickeries while playing board games. what makes you think a political group is incapable of forethought?

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Why, he had no need of it whatsoever, unfathomably he has won control of everything and owes no one anything. Also the world is just not this well managed, it's all just chaos and carnage and design in hindsight.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Then why mention his name at all. It's just like the covid checks, Trump demands/wants the attention.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›