this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
95 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

12156 readers
350 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] meliodas_101@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

"Made you look"

[–] BrightCandle@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

What I don't understand is why Intel was willing to lie so extensively. They knew they were going to get found out in a matter of months and that would do enormous damage to their brand. After the failures of 13th and 14th gen processors they weren't likely to be believed anyway. It makes no sense.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

Who cares. Buy AMD if you’re interested in quality. Intel fell off years ago and it is only going to get worse.

[–] quixotic120@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

“Technically ‘up to’ includes situations that do not improve or worsen performance” - some guy who works in advertising

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 3 points 7 months ago

There must be at least one scenario where it's improved 26%, otherwise it's a lie.