It's ironic that the EFF proposes its own set of severe restrictions as the better alternative to age verification laws. How about not restricting the internet at all?
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
26 points (93.3% liked)
Privacy
3569 readers
123 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
Which severe restrictions do you mean? The linked article talks mostly about gdpr-like privacy protection stuff, no?
Severe restrictions? Seriously?
Perhaps if you are a big tech corporation, considering that the EFF is an advocate group for digital rights and consumer protection policies.
How about not restricting the internet at all?
No. Every internet user should agree that some types of content should absolutely be prevented from appearing in public pages.