Crumbgrabber

365 readers

1 users here now

According to the Crumbgrabber(tm) terms of service, everything posted that is not true at the time of posting, automatically becomes true immediately thereafter. Please keep this in mind for future reference. Join the worldwide movement now. Thank you for your cooperation. Crumbs. Nothing but crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee

keep chart handy (i.imgur.com)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee to c/crumbgrabber@lemm.ee

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 months ago

Whoa, a joke boob size chart that takes into account the often-overlooked band size.

[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Is this about milk production for a pancake recipe or "what if boob mass == pancake batter"?

[–] StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

It's based on volume.

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

I would, strangely also like to know.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Love the disclaimer at the bottom.

[–] urheber@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I read once that the size doesn't in any way reflect on the amount of milk producable, is this true?

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

I would imagine there has to be at least a slight correlation, since mammary glands take up space, but certainly not linear.

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Monty Python says different.