this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
99 points (100.0% liked)

urbanism

22449 readers
1 users here now

This was supposed to be c/traingang, so post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Trainposts highly encouraged

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Local Law 18, which came into force Tuesday, is so strict it doesn’t just limit how Airbnb operates in the city—it almost bans it entirely for many guests and hosts. From now on, all short-term rental hosts in New York must register with the city, and only those who live in the place they’re renting—and are present when someone is staying—can qualify. And people can only have two guests.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] duderium@hexbear.net 44 points 2 years ago

Good fucking riddance. All landlords and bourgeoisie should be driven into the sea.

[–] Deadend@hexbear.net 40 points 2 years ago

Suddenly, thousands of new normal rental units available.

I hope this includes a snitch bounty.

[–] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 39 points 2 years ago

Lol, so this is why the Airbnb my parents rented to come and visit at Christmas got cancelled

A small price to pay

[–] Aryuproudomenowdaddy@hexbear.net 36 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Theo Yedinsky, global policy director for Airbnb. “The city is sending a clear message to millions of potential visitors who will now have fewer accommodation options when they visit New York City: You are not welcome.” Yedinsky says Airbnb has a goal of working with the city on “sensible” home-sharing rules, but he did not elaborate on the company’s next steps.

"We're just heckin small beans who are trying to make cities more accessible for tourism!"

[–] citrussy_capybara@hexbear.net 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah, this is the wrong move. New York needs to outlaw living in a place that is owned or rented. That way everywhere with a bed is available for tourists. The people can live and New Jersey and commute. The office spaces should be converted into dorm spaces to fit more tourists in. Turn the whole city into a theme park where no one actually lives and everything is even more overpriced. They’ll be sold out and booked for years. Rename it AirBNB presents: New York City. It’s the only way to tell tourists, “You are welcome”.

[–] newerAccountWhoDis@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did you just invent Venice

[–] citrussy_capybara@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

omg thank you for bringing this up, halfway through I was thinking “this sounds just like my experience in Venice” but I didn’t think it was relatable enough to mention anti-italian-action

[–] wtypstanaccount04@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

Don't give them any ideas

[–] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 19 points 2 years ago

lmao what's their plan for the city? just turn it into vegas? a big theme park for wealthy tourists with neighborhoods of expendable labor on the outskirts?

[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago

It’s a little known fact but tourism did not exist before Airbnb.

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] newerAccountWhoDis@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

Fuck landleeches

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fuck rent-seeking. Fuck landlordery. Fuck techbros rent-seeking off of the rent-seeking. disgost

[–] joaomarrom@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

who parasites the parasite?

[–] newerAccountWhoDis@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

still a parasite lmaooo gottem

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

whoop whoop! officer-down i wonder what proportion of the coalition was Hotel Money, but it's still fucking awesome.

[–] FumpyAer@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hotels are a better use of space than airbnb every time.

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

well of course, i'm just curious if this was a mobilization of good political energy that can go further, or capital choking some competition.

or if hotel owners even had incentives to support the law, because they own land that becomes more valuable as airbnb inflates property prices

[–] joaomarrom@hexbear.net 25 points 2 years ago
[–] Cummunism@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

and only those who live in the place they’re renting—and are present when someone is staying

I'm ok with this, mostly because anyone who is renting a room and is willing to live with strangers sometimes must need the money. That's not an ideal situation but it should be allowed since people are broke.

Some asshole with an empty apartment they AirBNB doesn't need the money, they have more than 1 residence apparently.

[–] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago

pretty poggers law

bring that to my state pls

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago

I wonder if this will significantly change the 'shadow vacancy' issue that's been going on. If the leeches can't make money off units that were not available in the rental market, they might have to sell them or rent them out.

https://www.thecity.nyc/housing/2022/10/19/23411956/60000-rent-stabilized-apartments-vacant-warehousing-nyc-landlords-housing

[–] wtypstanaccount04@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago