this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
433 points (98.4% liked)

News

31764 readers
2843 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Special counsel Jack Smith's report asserts sufficient evidence existed to convict Donald Trump for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election but cites Trump’s 2024 presidential victory as the reason charges were dropped, due to constitutional protections for sitting presidents.

Smith detailed Trump’s actions, including pressuring officials, spreading false election claims, and encouraging protests.

While charges against co-conspirators were considered, no final conclusions were reached.

Smith denied political bias, emphasizing adherence to facts and law.

The report also references challenges like expanded presidential immunity.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 74 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, no shit. Words can't describe how furious I am about Jan. 6 and the utter lack of accountability for the powerful people responsible for it. Including the GOP bootlickers in power at the time and still to this day.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Whenever my rage starts to fade, I remind myself how things would have played out if it’d been Obama and his followers who’d attacked the Capitol.

[–] Sciaphobia@lemm.ee 59 points 7 months ago

Look at them trying to convince us there's rule of law. Don't worry guys, the system that isn't completely corrupt to its core WOULD have worked. Source: Trust me bro.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 45 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ok, but he wasn't a president when he did the crime. Convict him.

[–] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

Biden wasn't sworn in yet, Trump was still President.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Jack Smith better be getting him and his family the fuck out of the U.S. and to a country without an extradition treaty because their lives are worth nothing in America now.

Unfortunately, that doesn't leave him with a lot of great options.

[–] ClanOfTheOcho@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I'm not saying it isn't correct, but the US having an extradition treaty with Cuba is a bit suspicious.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You can live pretty well in China. They call themselves expats when they live there.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

With what he knows? They would interrogate the fuck out of him and keep him under constant surveillance.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Y'all thinking anything is going to happen to Jack are going to be surprised when nothing happens to him and he writes his book and gets his TV show and just coasts into retirement in a gated community.

"It's a big club and you ain't in it." but Jack and Don both are.

[–] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, Trump would have to get pretty bored to go after Jack Smith... maybe -MAYBE- a Gaetz DOJ would have gone after him like a cat offering a dead mouse at Trump's front door, but I don't really see Trump world caring about this any longer. All the FNC talking heads have stopped, well, talking about Jack Smith.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago

Exactly, he served his purpose. He "prosecuted" Trump, he aired the crimes committed and purposely slow walked the investigation. Trump won a second term, Jack will now "fade into obscurity" with a book deal, tv show, and mansion.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Imagine believing that this racist system of violence created by literal slave masters is about justice.

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 31 points 7 months ago

Aw shucks, that’s a bummer. Good try though, fellas! You gave it your all and I’m sure you’ll gettem next time!

(≖_≖ )

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is nonsense. He wouldn't have been convicted and the proof for that was that he wasn't convicted.

It was never going to happen. The timing made sure of it.

A convenient excuse.

My homework would have got an A+ if I had handed it in.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

let the records show that i did in fact do my homework. to prove this, i will release it publicly to world. pay no mind to the fact that the deadline has already passed.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 20 points 7 months ago

Don't wait so long that the criminal can run and win again, before justice gets served then...

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 19 points 7 months ago

...and would receive no punishement

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What is the constitutional protection for sitting presidents? You mean that part in the constitution which says presidents are basically kings and they are above the law and they can do whatever they want? Oh yeah, that part. That part that totally exists and totally says that.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 7 months ago

SCOTUS says this constitutional protections are there. We should totally trust SCOTUS. It’s not like SCOTUS is unbelievably corrupt, doing the bidding of billionaires, or trying to usher in a Conservative wet dream.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 7 months ago

All this time and effort and the only person that came close to stopping this madness was Thomas Matthew Crooks.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Woulda coulda shoulda

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago

Yeah okay sure. And I’d be the Archbishop of Canterbury if it weren’t for those pesky meddling kids too right