this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
66 points (93.4% liked)

Games

41252 readers
1166 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Dremor@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Dremor@jlai.lu
modfxomt@lemmy.world
66
Assassin's Creed Shadows delayed again to March 20 (www.eurogamer.net)
submitted 6 months ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It was previously releasing Feb 14. Does not look good for Ubisoft.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] erin@social.sidh.bzh 23 points 6 months ago (3 children)

that's the problem:

"the company had appointed advisors to review and pursue various transformational strategic and capitalistic options to extract the best value for stakeholders".

Companies should focus on extracting the best value for consumers not stakeholders... when it was created the stoke market was supposed to be disconnected from real economy to prevent that situation where companies tries to give priority to the stakeholders (who don't produce anything and don't increase GDP) over consumers. When that rule started being ignored in the beginning of the XX century and provocked the 1929 krack they should have take it at a warning and stop doing that instead of continuing that heresy.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ubisoft will likely be a private company soon, and I doubt the situation will change much in the aftermath.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah the difference between being public and private disappears when the “private” part just means a private equity firm.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

The private equity that would control it after it goes private, in all likelihood, would be the same family who controls it today and always has controlled it. They're not interested in stripping it for parts, but they're also not interested in scaling their operations down and learning some hard lessons to make a sustainable video game company.

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Are you thinking of shareholders?

Stakeholders and shareholders are different. Consumers are stakeholders in this case.

[–] erin@social.sidh.bzh 2 points 6 months ago

hum yes, English is not my main language, sorry ><

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Giving some Weird Al vibes with that mission…

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

lol, this game's fucked beyond salvation.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

It's a Ubisoft game. It was doomed to begin with.

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Are delays not good? It's preferable to being broken on launch, not to say that it couldn't be, but it's likely that it would be more broken if not delayed.

[–] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

When a game gets delayed it's not a good sign in general. It means "the game is broken and we can't release it as it is".

Of course a delayed game will be better than a game that needed to be delayed and released anyways instead, but realistically speaking you can't fix a broken AAA sized game in one or two months.

Add this to the fact that Ubisoft (rightfully so) earned a bad reputation among players as time went on, and that devs can't work at their best when they are crunching and they fear to be laid off, and you'll understand why non-casual gamers don't have faith in the game.

[–] glitches_brew@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Takes extra time to get that fourth A.

Also, never give Ubisoft money.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

They're not saying it but I think it's likely this is because of all the big games coming out in February. Civ 7, Avowed, and Monster Hunter Wilds are the three big ones and those take up a lot of time. Shadows would get lost in the weeds. Meanwhile there isn't really a big game coming out in March. So perfect time.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Assassin's creed died with 2 when they fired the creator and decided to milk it as much as possible.

So sad what this series has become, considering its counter-culture influences.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Would have loved to see the original vision through

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Me too.

Personally, I thought the series would've ended with getting to play as Desmond for most of the game, actually being an assassin in the modern day.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

It could have gone anywhere, the rumour was modern day third to close out the story.

It could have gone to settlements in space, templar industry types creating advanced cities to escape a doomed earth allowing for a cryogenically frozen Desmond to believeably do some of the stunt in space conditions.

Instead they picked random times and shoehorned in a rethread story barely expanding on the lore by walking all over it.

[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I feel more sorry for the Assasins Creed fans. Started by being a stealth parkour game, and its now just trying to be The Witcher

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Whomp Whomp

[–] mbinn@fedia.io 2 points 6 months ago

They are welcome to delay it again and again :)

[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

KCD2 effect

[–] TastyWheat@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

When does it ever look good for Ubisoft?