this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
527 points (98.7% liked)

politics

25300 readers
2652 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 110 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Classic twisting of the thumb screws. The prisoners dilemma is functional of how trustworthy your co-conspirator is.

And its safe to say when it comes to people who seriously would consider trying to overthrow an election for personal gain, you cant trust any of em, so of course everyone is gonna crack. 10/10 this will be fun to watch

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 52 points 2 years ago

The Nuremberg Defense probably works better if the person whose orders you claim to have been following is still alive and ranting on Twitter about how they damn well were his orders and he takes credit for the whole thing.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

Remember to bend the knees Mark, and look back as you follow through the flip.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

feverently munching on popcorn

[–] FUCKRedditMods@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You probably meant fervently or feverishly (which may be even funnier)

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Yup. It’s been a day already. Either works. 😔🤣

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, are you allowed to call in to Hannity's show from federal prison? What about state prison? Asking for someone who is definitely not a friend.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It would depend on the warden

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I hope Trump gets a friendly warden. Someone who will let him have contact with the outside world so his base can see how pitiful their caged buffoon is. I'm sure there will be vigils outside the gate, and maybe even an escape attempt...

maybe some toilet Pruno.

[–] pottedmeat7910@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I don't think it will help. Pre-trial non-incarcerated Trump is already buffoonishly pathetic and all it does is make the smoothbrains cheer louder.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I'm amusing myself with the idle day dreams of a warden that lets him watch all the news, and see twitter and his dumpster-fire-platform... and even face book, but it's all strictly one way. So he can see the world move on and forget about him.

then again that might actually constitute cruel and unusual punishment, in his case.

[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't see why all of them are not telling on Trump. Trump certainly doesn't care about them and I believe if Trump could blame it all on them, he would.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think some of them are deluded enough to think that it really is like an impeachment and any jury is going to be hopelessly deadlocked between its Democratic and Republican members. Or that the deep state will work its magic, retire all the prosecutors, and there will never even be trials.

I mean, these are generally not smart people with firm grip on reality we're talking about.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, the Georgia legislature already has members trying to get rid of Fani Willis, and if they can stall them out that long, the federal cases will disappear under the next Republican president.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah but that’s not happening, it’s nowhere near the same situation as the impeachments. Kemp is ensuring Fanni is left alone by that bullshit so she can focus on the case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] negativenull@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They have nothing to lose by turning on Trump at this point.

[–] Kerrigor@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago

The rabid MAGA idiots will threaten them. But to that I say, oh no, too bad, let me make some popcorn

[–] hanni@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago

Getting killed by medicated trump cultists?

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Love watching sharks turn on one another.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Rev up the circular firing squad and I'll grab some popcorn...

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

At this point, I don't get really what is gained by flipping people against Trump. The argument isn't that he did or didn't do something. The argument is (in the minds of the jury at least) is what he did against the law. Yes, it might seem clear to us that it was, but to some Trump supporter on the jury having someone else say 'Trump did a thing', doesn't change their mind that the thing he did and admits to doing is illegal.

[–] drewofdoom@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Cooperation from co-conspirators is always helpful.

Trump's current strategy (or, at least what we can discern from his lawyers' TV appearances) is to blame the lawyers he had at the time of the election. If all these co-conspirators point the finger directly at Trump, that goes a loooong way to proving that he was the ringleader. Not some lawyer. Not some aide. Trump called the shots.

That's what they want.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Just imagine someone close to the whole situation turns against Trump as a witness.They could provide the extra juicy bits that would make impressing the jury much easier.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

The GOP Civil War rages on.

[–] Jackolantern@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

And now we wait. Hopefully this guy follows through and flip like a gymnast on steroids.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

This promises to be the greatest media spectacle of all time.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Dooooooo it!

[–] FUCKRedditMods@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Stop it I can only giggle so hard

[–] Kerrigor@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I can only get so erect

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Delicious!!

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Everyone is pointing at Eastman primarily.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hopefully he's not planning on releasing a book before that.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Morgan Freeman: “ohhh…. I’ve already signed for the audiobook deal.”