this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
75 points (98.7% liked)

Linux

8924 readers
455 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So that sounds all nice, why the change from the yesteryears?

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 43 points 7 months ago (1 children)

AI processing is a moneymaker for them. It runs on Linux, usually, so they want to ensure they are not leapfrogged. They are not supporting Linux, they are trying to make more money. However, it happens to benefits Linux.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 7 months ago

Also windows is getting more and more unusable for productive/commercial/government use, so if they want to keep selling to that market, they will have to make their hardware work on linux too.

[–] nous@programming.dev 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

becoming production capable and ready for prime-time use from Linux gamers to workstation customers and data centers.

I would bet on it being the boom in AI increasing demands for Nvidia GPUs in data centers which largely run Linux wanting better support. Bet they don't care at all about workstation users and Wayland support is a by product of making it work better with the kernel overall.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 7 months ago

I'm not so sure. The drivers already do a good job with CUDA. Data centers and AI certainly don't care about Wayland support.

I think this has more to do with seeing Windows 11 get worse and Linux handhelds grow. Letting AMD take share can only be allowed for so long without greater risk.