this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
321 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

77872 readers
3163 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] icerunner_origin@startrek.website 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

About how far does this leave us from a usable quantum processor? How far from all current cryptographic algorithms being junk?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The latest versions of TLS already have support post-quantum crypto, so no, it's not all of them. For the ones that are vulnerable, we're way, way far off from that. It may not even be possible to have enough qbits to break those at all.

Things like simulating medicines, folding proteins, and logistics are much closer, very useful, and more likely to be practical in the medium term.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there gov money in folding proteins though? I assume there’s a lot of 3 letter agencies what want decryption with a lot more funding.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's plenty of publicly funded research for that, yes.

Three letter agencies also want to protect their own nation's secrets. They have as much interest in breaking it as they do protecting against it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Algorithms will be easier and faster to fix than the process of getting this breakthrough to viability

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 year ago

Just in time for the fall of American democracy. What could possibly go wrong.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 10 points 1 year ago

Seeing quantum computers work will be like seeing mathemagics at work, doing it all behind the scenes. Physically (for the small ones) it looks the same, but abstractly it can perform all kinds of deep mathematics.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

108 qubits, but error correction duty for some of them?

What size RSA key can it factor "instantly"?

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Currently none, I think it's allegedly 2000 qbits to break RSA

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›