this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
75 points (83.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33895 readers
1732 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 100 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It speaks to how powerless people feel here in America.

That's what it says.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And we’ve been conditioned to accept violence in our everyday lives. Instead of putting aside our differences and making the government work for us to keep capitalism in check. One is just much more exiting.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

making the government work for us to keep capitalism in check.

lol

All we elect are capitalists.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We need more candidates like Vermin Supreme, who clearly have no capitalist agendas.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 32 points 8 months ago

No, we need more candidates like Sanders who actually give a shit about the common people.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 66 points 8 months ago

If you don't want most of the world to celebrate your death, try to be less of an asshole.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, the bullets had the motive written on them in sharpie, so I don’t think there’s any chance this is a random murder, right?

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hypothetical: he picked his target at random. Researched. Finds out he was an insurance CEO. Devises this plan to throw investigators off the scent.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 26 points 8 months ago

Then we've discovered the world's most inefficient try-hard serial killer. If you have the slightest modicum of common sense then when you realize that the "random" target you've picked is a mega-rich CEO then you just pick a different random target.

And it has no significance whatsoever with regards to the general public's reaction. At this point the true motives of the murderer are irrelevant, the general public has imagined him into a hero and that's the important part.

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 45 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The ceo was an actual villain no matter the actual motive.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I don't think his intentions matter at this point. People have already made him a folk hero. He could say he shot him because he stepped on his shoe and there's a good chance people will still say, "Valid, fuck that guy."

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That's not just hypothetical but downright false. The shooter made his motive very clear.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 months ago

Just your average delay/deny/defend/depose killer

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't mean it's the truth

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I mean, is this just a wild hypothetical? Because it's really obvious that this isn't the case. Nothing about this murder was normal. He wasn't some professional killer because he was sloppy with cameras and the garbage in Starbucks. But he definitely plotted and planned to murder this guy. And then he purposely left evidence of his motive. The gun he used was rare, and he clearly trained with the weapon because of how quickly he was able to clear the jam he had and then kept firing.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Speculative discussion is pointing towards the smiling guy but bring the same person. Any conclusions to the methods of the shooter are still very fraught.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How about now? You think they just released some random person's photo still?

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You mean how I used the word speculative?

Or how I said conclusions are fraught?

You didn't know any better than anyone else, and perhaps you forget the Boston bomber situation, but it's always good to slow down on plastering someone's face/identity on a crime till reports are concrete.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The police released that information because they were confident in it. It wasn't reddit.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

And reports from authorities, at the time I commented that, were raising concerns that it may not have been the same person. My comment was one of caution, yours is of luck.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago

To be clear: I'm talking about a possibility, not a prediction.

We've nothing to go on but incomplete and likely incorrect public information. It would be foolish of me to entrench around speculation.

[–] MooseTheDog@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Good riddance to bad shit. Sometimes the right thing for the wrong reasons is right enough

[–] nl4real@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

It's still a warning sign that a large number people no longer feel peacefully working within the system can address societal issues.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

That's what I've been wondering, we really don't even know what the motive was, but the one thing that kind of elevates this beyond him being a "basic murderer" is the carved words on the bullets. That seems to suggest some kind of motive above just him being a hitman or just killing some random person.

Regardless, I think most people are having the reaction they're having to this because of our ridiculous healthcare system, everyone recognizes it as a problem and alot of people have a loved one who has been wronged by it. Almost any other issue would've created a partisan split where Republicans took one position and Democrats took the other position. That a set of clear Left/Right narratives haven't emerged yet kind of suggests that alot of people aren't particularly bothered by it. Where this goes though is anyone's guess, maybe it's just a single unified moment that is quickly overshadowed by some other bullshit that comes along.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

It says we don't care how wealthy people die. We just want them to be six feet under.

[–] mehdi_benadel@lemmy.balamb.fr 9 points 8 months ago

That we care too much about randos with lots of money earned from stealing sick people? 🙃

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 8 points 8 months ago

CEO murdered.... Yep, that's all we need.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

The effect that Gun violence has against one man vs a plethora of school children.

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 8 points 8 months ago

the ceo is paid big because his decisions affect a lot of lives.

in this case, the killer can be any of these people the ceo has affected on some policy he let pass. the killer could even be just an enforcing arm of some one, or some group.

on one side, you can see this reaction as just part of his "job description". even doctors know toying with people's health have grave consequences.

[–] recentSloth43@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Doesn't change much for me. Violence is a consequence of a broken system. Whatever the motive was, fixing the system is the solution either way.

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Serendipity :)

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

it doesnt matter. It wouldnt matter if he killed him because he didnt like how he tied his shoelaces.

what matters is we have unifying event and if its allowed to be wasted then its all fucked. And i dont mean rallying people to start killing everyone but rallying people to stop being apathetic and demand change together.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

The bullets had a very specific heath insurance mantra inscribed on them, "deny, defend, depose". Highly unlikely it was a random occurrence. I really believe the shooter was wronged somehow, but UHC. Maybe they denied a claim that lead to the death of a loved one, etc.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I go from it being a statement about the times to a mundane murder that warrants no coverage.

He had a sweet life until he didn't. Still don't feel bad. If that makes me a bad person, well, America doesn't care about that either clearly so guess it is what it is. Shrug emoji

[–] regdog@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

What the hell is a "basic murderer"?

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Don't extort people using their health?

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 1 points 8 months ago

meh. Ends justify the means. Destination, not how you get there.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

It means society is in danger because lots of people think lots of other people deserve death.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee -5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The reaction to the death already demonstrates peoples' misplaced priorities, and it being a mundane murder (or inspired by, say, a highly disagreeable agenda) would just put, as they say, egg on their face.

The last time this happened, Batman was born.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The last time this happened, Batman was born.

That's so cool! Everybody loves superheroes, for that reason alone we should kill loads more billionaires.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Not what I said. It was a joke anyways, but I was implying that calamity affects people in ways that bite society later on.

Are people around these parts really so careless that they think murder for the sake of disagreement is justified?