this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
795 points (99.4% liked)

politics

25059 readers
2244 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Republican-led states with near-total abortion bans are delaying or halting maternal mortality reviews, raising concerns about efforts to conceal rising deaths.

Texas, where maternal deaths rose 56% from 2019 to 2022, refused to review 2022-2023 cases, citing a backlog.

Investigations found multiple preventable deaths tied to abortion bans, such as Porsha Ngumenzi, who died after being denied miscarriage care.

Georgia fired its entire Maternal Mortality Review Committee after leaks about preventable deaths.

Critics argue these actions aim to suppress evidence linking abortion bans to maternal fatalities, delaying accountability for years.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 261 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Texas ... refused to review 2022-2023 cases, citing a backlog.

"There's too many cases of maternal death, so we're just going to stop looking at them."

Good job, Texas.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 138 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It worked for Florida with COVID.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 40 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 months ago

"Lalalala can't hear you "

People suck sometimes, so glad I live in a very blue area with good community

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 months ago

Yeah I was about to say, pretty on brand.

[–] StopTouchingYourPhone@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Like the hundreds of thousands of untested rape kits that piled up over the decades.

Boxes about the size of a hardcover book each held evidence of a reported sexual assault – dried swabs of saliva and semen and blood, strands of hair, debris scraped from under fingernails. Each was collected from a person, most of them women and girls, during an hours long exam. And each was shelved without being processed for DNA. The evidence crowded storerooms, tangible proof of law enforcement’s failure to support victims and hold rapists accountable.

Testing the kits was supposed to be the first step in righting that wrong. In some places that received federal grants, not even that happened.

At least a dozen grant recipients carved out exceptions to testing, leaving kits unprocessed for a second time. In one California county, officials boasted they had cleared their backlog, but only after deeming more than half of their kits ineligible for testing.

In many cases, officials have done little beyond sending the kits to a lab, reviewing the results and again closing the files. In Maryland, according to a state report, some law enforcement agencies have shown “significant reluctance” to reopen investigations and have even stated outright that they are disregarding DNA matches.

What’s more, some officials all but abandoned the idea of providing victims answers about what happened to their rape kits or apologies for how long testing took. One Kansas police agency has tried to reach just 17 victims from roughly 1,100 sexual assault kits. An official there said there are instances where DNA testing has identified the names of suspects for the first time but the victims have not been told, because officials don’t think their cases can be prosecuted.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 163 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

if covid taught us anything, it’s that the easiest way to make a problem “go away” is to stop collecting data about it

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the too retarded to fail strategy.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Downvoting this is retarded.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I don't think I'll be on the right side of history here, but we're gonna do it for science.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well shit boss, we made it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No we’re only allowed to make fun of dumb (unable to speak) and lame (unable to walk) people.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

That's fucking retarded.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

Literally 1984

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Like Trump’s drone strikes

[–] PoopSpiderman@lemmy.world 97 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You can’t make an omelette without killing lots of women.

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago (3 children)

If they were worried about birth rates before...

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

It's all ideology. They scream about not having enough white babies and then do one more thing to make the birthrate drop. But all that proves is the insidiousness of the other side. Gotta keep doubling down.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 68 points 8 months ago

Red states have had the highest maternal mortality before the abortion ban/restrictions.

Just adding to the pile of bodies.

[–] intresteph@discuss.online 60 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I hear CEO bodies are piling up.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They say these things come in threes.

[–] intresteph@discuss.online 3 points 8 months ago

Hopefully three—thousand

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 42 points 8 months ago (11 children)

if there isn't already a mutual aid network then start one. Women need to leave states where they have less rights than a dog while they still have the right to leave.

[–] dion_starfire@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not everyone has the means and opportunity to pack up and leave a shitty state.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 9 points 8 months ago

if there isn't already a mutual aid network then start one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_aid

Give them the means and opportunity

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is what they want. Getting pregnant in red states is literally too dangerous. Their birth rate is going to hot rock bottom in the next 4 years. Women communicate about this stuff, so even if the government isn't reporting on it but the rates are so high every women will eventually know someone personally that died because of these bans.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They're not targeting us, they're targeting future women that won't know anything about rape, sexual assault, sex Ed, etc. once they complete dismantling the education system. If this trend continues, they're gonna get what they want. Organize, and be vocal outside of lemmy. Yes we're all talking about it, but no one else is. Talk about it, be unfriended, stand up or shut up.

And as a quick aside, imagine being such a colossal pussy, that you have to dictate what other people do because you're afraid of women and or your own sexuality. These are the people we're talking about about. I used to think that "oh no one is better than anyone else" but we absolutely have to be better than these people. They're fucking monsters and they're going to keep ruining our shit.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And then it will be normal and not a big deal

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

That’s my concern. It’ll go the way of climate change and school shootings.

The narrative will shift from “it doesn’t happen” to “there’s nothing we can do to stop it” to “why even bother? It’s normal so it’s not a big deal.”

[–] itsJoelle@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

To be fair, they can get away with this just because the anti-choice stance is so ravenous they have a self-righteous-sized blind spot for preventable suffering of others.

Sadly, this won’t be covered broadly enough or penetrate the bubbles it needs to for opinion to change. Even in 2024 only 9% of voters listed abortion as their most important issue. Where 48% listed inflation, “the economy”, or immigration as their most important issue. Draw from that what you will, but I don’t think the average voter understands the … externalities of strong anti-abortion measures.

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Thank goodness none of them were CEOs!

load more comments
view more: next ›