this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
86 points (96.7% liked)

Canada

10248 readers
637 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RehRomano@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Subsidizing homeowners with a taxpayer-funded cheque for $500 is regressive policy for a leftist party. Even if we're means-testing it, there's so many better ways that money could be spent.

Once again, as a renter dealing with year over year increases of hundreds of dollars per month, I get nothing.

[–] Ryan213@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Wait until the Conservatives take over. You'll get stuff taken away. Lol

None of the parties are offering any solutions. Either status quo or free money that'll last less than a week.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

We could do something really radical and start socializing necessities. Sure, a lot of rich would complain, and plenty of poor people, until they realized it helped them. F the billionaires’ third vacation home.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

so many better ways that money could be spent.

Yeah but that bit of cash looks soooo good for the press. Free money right!? Just ignore the dumpster fire behind you, here's your pittance, peasant. Now get back in line! crack

[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 12 points 2 years ago

$500 benefit payment for low-income families to help them pay their rent. What the landlord does? raise the rent 50$/month and at the end of the year, the 500$ gov-funded money is in his pocket :)

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

No.

Jesus Christ, this is the grocery rebate all over again: socializing the profits of the wealthy. It's a terrible idea from a supposedly left-wing party.

Unless this comes with a rider "...and we'd going to personally take the funds for this by taxing the ten richest people in Canada" then this is not worth doing.

[–] Stanwich@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Fuuuuuuuuuck that. I'm tired of paying for these grants. I make too much to get any back. I work my ass off in a single income family with a disabled child who I can barely spend time with anymore to watch everyone else get grants. I'm fucking tired of it.

[–] Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Stop normalizing RENT, it's a fucking hole people just throw money into

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

They should be focusing on making home ownership cheaper.

The cheaper homes are;

A) the less landlords have to pay for mortgages so they can charge less for rent

B) More people can afford to own instead of rent, reducing demand for rentals and bringing rental costs down

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Can Singh go back to the school of economic thought he belongs to?

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

I'd love a handout but it does nothing to actually help. Literally a bribe.

If you vote for me I'll pay you.