this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
155 points (99.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7192 readers
1 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

Capital gains should simply count as income for tax purposes.

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wait you mean taxing the rich actually works? surprised-pika

[–] Moyer1666@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Crazy right?

[–] MisterChief@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So is this total sales for the year exceeding $250k or a single transaction. My guess is the total for the year but the article doesn't specify.

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It is an annual tax if you create capital gains every year.

The measure passed in 2021 imposed a 7% tax on the sale of stocks, bonds and other high-end assets in excess of $250,000 for both individuals and couples.

The tax took effect Jan. 1, 2022. First payments are due on or before April 18.

and

Retirement accounts, real estate, farms and forestry were all exempt from the tax. Business owners were also exempt from the tax if they are regularly involved in running the business for five of the previous 10 years before they sell, own it for at least five years, and gross $10 million or less a year before the sale.

and

Under the new law, taxpayers could deduct up to $100,000 a year from their capital gains if they made more than $250,000 in charitable donations in the same tax year, something Huber cited in his ruling, noting that like “an income tax and unlike an excise tax, the new tax statute includes a deduction for certain charitable donations the taxpayer has made during the tax year.”

is all from an article linked from the article.

https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/olympia/supreme-court-ruling-capital-gains-tax-washington/281-ba3293e4-87b1-4965-bb41-b8e567080d0f

[–] Ho_Chi_Chungus@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Good. Maybe now they can bring down the regressive sales tax. Or maybe even bring down the massive liquor tax so I'm not paying $20 for an $8 handle of vodka

[–] bronzle@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago