this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
180 points (97.9% liked)

PC Gaming

12238 readers
461 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Beryl@jlai.lu 29 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not if they do it the same way as the OOT port. You provide the ROM, their code then picks it apart and puts it back together into an executable. There’s nothing for ninty to sue about.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You forgot one small detail, Nintendo doesn't need a legal basis to sue. They have more money which allows them to weaponize the legal system against anyone they don't like. Any small team like this cant even afford lawyers.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Apart from the fact that they haven’t gone after the OOT recompiler.

Minty is the most litigious gaming company around, they don’t sit on their haunches and wait to see what comes next. If there was something to sue over, they would have.

Just like they would have sued the hundreds of Pokémon romhack groups out there if they could.

[–] Caboose12000@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

this is what people used to say about switch emulation

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago

The Switch emus included certain decryption keys, which was a pretty balant violation to be fair.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The Switch emulation litigation was much more grey than this. There were multiple problems with Yuzu, not the least of which was the official channels openly supporting and aiding piracy. They also included encryption keys, which is always a no-no.

You’ll notice that the only emulator that got taken down through litigation was Yuzu and forks. There are other Switch emulators out there which are perfectly fine.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 20 points 9 months ago

I hope more reversal engineering teams pop up like this because I like this sort of thing

[–] insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe 8 points 9 months ago

You fool!

Be a good grandma: Tussle your grandkids' hair and tell 'em YOU WILL EAT WHEN THE FOOD IS READY!

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Surprised the headline didn't use the word "quietly", since that seems to be the most popular buzzword this year.