this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
434 points (97.4% liked)

World News

48917 readers
1652 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky warned that Ukraine would lose the war if the U.S., its primary military supporter, cuts funding.

Speaking to Fox News, he stressed the importance of unity between the U.S. and Ukraine as Russia accelerates its territorial gains.

Zelensky acknowledged Ukraine’s challenges on the battlefield, despite new U.S. weapon supplies, including long-range missiles and anti-personnel land mines.

He criticized German Chancellor Olaf Scholz for engaging with Putin, calling it a risky move.

Trump has pledged to end the war quickly but offered no specifics.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 59 points 8 months ago (17 children)

Give em full air support. If it causes world war 3, it causes world war 3. Fuck it. Avoiding that isn't worth letting Russia just consume its neighbors on a whim - that shit certainly won't stop with Ukraine.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

if it causes ww3, it will be a lot less bloody war than what will be if russia is allowed to recover and take over next country

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 5 points 8 months ago

There isnt enough North Koreans for that.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Maybe if WW3 breaks out, Biden won't hand over power to the literal fascists that are already making decisions to cause our demise.

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Wtf? That's such a casual suggestion to dismantle democracy. Yeah let's do that so we never get a progressive in office /s

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If we're going to have an autocracy, it may as well be the one that is still somewhat benevolent to the common man.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

It wouldn't be the first time a country did that. It's never ended particularly well though.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Russia is also already instigating it with having North Korean troops in the combat zone. It'll just be a tit-for-tat response.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

If US cuts funding it would be abandoning its allies in violation of the Budapest memorandum which the US signed in '94 to protect Ukraine if Russia invades, and that violation from Russia since 2014 also grants Ukraine back its nuclear program which should have been supported by allies like the US. The only language a dictator like Putin understands is violence or the threat of violence, look at the nuclear saber rattling he does frequently and how people and nations capitulate to it and the only neighbors they avoid are either nuclear armed or NATO allied.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Well, if it violates the Budapest memorandum of 1994, of course Trump will change his mind. /s

That aside, it only would kick in if Russia used nuclear weapons, anyway. Link to the text. The present effort is all about trying to keep Europe safe through deterrence, and to a lesser degree supporting a democracy that's under attack.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The US may yet betray Ukraine and break its agreement under the treaty, I hope not but I don't expect anything else from Putin's #1 sycophant.

  1. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the CSCE Final Act, to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine.

CSCE final act, not exclusive to using nuclear weapons: https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Final_Act_of_the_Conference_on_Security_and_Cooperation_in_Europe

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, Russia definitely broke their word here. I just don't see anything that says the US has to intervene.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 14 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Unfortunately the Budapest Memorandum doesn't obligate the US to actually protect Ukraine.

Hopefully Europe can fill the gap left if Putin's puppet cuts support US support

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Of course the letter of the treaty can be interpreted, what does "immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine" include in literal obligations? But the intent of the document seems clear that the signatories are there to hold each other accountable to prevent nuclear proliferation, if the guarantees are no longer valid like the repeated Russian violation of Ukraine sovereign borders, the other signatories are expected to either protect Ukraine or reinstate their nuclear arms.

Edit: including link to the document text https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Ukraine._Memorandum_on_Security_Assurances

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine"

That's the strongest language I see, and that obligation could be filled by just pushing for Ukraine's defense in the Security Council.

I think the US has been unfairly reserved in its support of Ukraine. They should have given jets, permission to strike in Russia, and more a long time ago. But I don't think they're obligated by that memorandum to do even what they have.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 31 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If the US cuts funding can Ukraine use their remaining stockpile of US weapons without restriction?

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but they will run out of weapons very quickly

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 17 points 8 months ago

True but at least deliveries are being supercharged for the next couple of months. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm all for America funding as much as possible, but FFS Europe, the monster is ringing your doorbell.

[–] Metz@lemmy.world 82 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

That reads as if the EU is just sitting on its hands and doing nothing. Please keep in mind that there is significant financial support coming from the EU:

image

Source: https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/

Where the EU cannot compete with the US is in the supply of military goods. For the simple reason that these do not exist to the extent that the US has them.


Edit: I have to correct myself in a detail. The graph of course shows Europe not the EU. So it includes e.g. the UK as well. The point still stands though looking on the rest of the data.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Jesus fuck that really puts it into perspective how much larger the United States military complex is. I want to to see this combined with the Israeli financing. I mean is what we bitch about being bad over budgeting of the defense budget or whatever it falls under really just a means of paying other countries to fight battles they used to send US soldiers to fight? Did I just become pro-military complex?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] r00ty@kbin.life 51 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Europe ARE doing a lot. We just don't have as much of an aging stockpile of weapons as the US does. Also when turned into financial contribution you need to convert it to a percentage of GDP.

Well, turns out someone made that data available.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1303450/bilateral-aid-to-ukraine-in-a-percent-of-donor-gdp/
https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/

Europe most certainly are doing their part.

However, that's not the real fear. The USA is going into a new presidential term, a term where the house, senate and the supreme court are going to likely side with the president on most things.

The USA can put significant pressure on European countries. If we're to believe Trump is really working in Putin's favour then, as well as stopping US aid, there's not too much stopping the US pressuring Europe from doing the same. That is my real fear. I think without US support this is hard, very hard for Europe to fill that gap. But, we certainly can still try.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 8 months ago

Trump: Oh no that's horrible, on an unrelated note heeeey Putin how that deal going for a Trump tower in Moscow

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-reviews-plan-halt-us-military-aid-ukraine-unless-it-negotiates-peace-with-2024-06-25/

Trump's plan is just to force Ukraine to hand whatever the Russians have taken over to the Russians, or whatever or they stop getting aid.

The Kremlin said any peace plan proposed by a possible future Trump administration would have to reflect the reality on the ground but that Russian President Vladimir Putin remained open to talks.

The Kremlin said any peace plan proposed by a possible future Trump administration would have to reflect the reality on the ground but that Russian President Vladimir Putin remained open to talks.

So Putin's puppet will let them take what they have under control..and knowing Trump and Putin, probably more, like sanctions or stripping Ukraine of more autonomy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

That was kind of the point. Trump, Putin and Netanyahu are playing everyone. Started the Gaza attack knowing Americans move on and will forget about Ukraine once Gaza is in flames and he was right. Americans don't care about Ukraine anymore, they've moved on and voted with Putin. Just waiting for the next conflict now that will distract everyone away from Gaza

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Frankly speaking Russia and China would have a great opportunity to try to appear sane for Europe when Trump gets into office. Like offer an actual peace for the price of giving a huge middle finger to USA. Trump admin seem to be begging for us to do it anyway.

I suspect that this is a pipe-dream and they will not do that, and also for Russia their credibility is pretty much gone and I don't see any way they could restore it.

China might be able to pull it off though.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago
[–] index@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Ukrainian people and russian people already lost the war, casualties are up to a million

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but Ukraine can lose twice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inv3r510n@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Can’t believe you’re being downvoted for this. Everyday people are the ones who lose in a war regardless of nationality. The people who wage wars don’t fight them.

[–] demonhunt@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

what's next? the sky is blue? duhh

load more comments
view more: next ›