this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
542 points (94.3% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 66 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Jokes on you. I'm a Machinist and that feature on the drawing has an perpendicularity GD&T callout of +- 1deg. In spec is in spec. Ship it!!!

[–] eatham@aussie.zone 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, no- it's the design engineer who is clearly wrong.

[–] c_jay@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Nah I blame the mathematicians

[–] Late2TheParty@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I like this positive attitude!

[–] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago
[–] NaibofTabr 60 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

As long as it's perfectly 89° it's fine. That's acute angle.

[–] Selmafudd@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

It's very well drawn too, no overshooting on the edges. Looks good to me.

[–] eatham@aussie.zone 11 points 2 years ago
[–] roon@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Barely acute 😳

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Engineers: Eh, close enough.

[–] theotherone@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

shrugs Same order of magnitude

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I didn't know 1° difference would be this noticeable. I am very disturbed.

[–] eatham@aussie.zone 18 points 2 years ago

It's noticable cos its 87 degrees not 89.

[–] neoney@lemmy.neoney.dev 22 points 2 years ago

Guys it’s actually 90° but the photo is taken on an angle.

[–] imgonnatrythis@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

More concerned about why you wasted all those colors on this image when two was sufficient?

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 years ago

Ahhh, I love it when the 89 degree angles are perfectly 89 degrees.

[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

I’ll see you in hell

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

You should have put the little square thing in the corner to indicate a right angle!

[–] covert_czar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] covert_czar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

Anybody who posts images like this have a special position in hell

[–] FellowEarthling@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I can't believe you've done this

[–] spacesweedkid27@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It's still perfect since you can just take 32040 of these (= 89*360, ggt is 1 since 89 is prime) and then you will have a full circle. A real shame it would have been when you would have took an irrational amount of degrees since then this calculation would not be possible. There could only be an approximation that makes it impossible in reality to decide if it is right or not but mathematically speaken it would be impossible.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

That's not right.

[–] finickydesert@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

After reading the title I internally thought: "fuck!"

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You evil son of a witch.

[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Not a whole circle? BASTARD!

[–] phej@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago

Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] Absolutemehperson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

You monster.