this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
41 points (100.0% liked)

Tree Huggers

875 readers
9 users here now

A community to discuss, appreciate, and advocate for trees and forests. Please follow the SLRPNK instance rules, found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Welcome to the challenge for November 9th which is the 3rd one so far after #8 and this post with the original idea.

Warning: Comments may contain spoilers, so only read them once you're ready.

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] rbn@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

spoilerIt's not a nut in the botanical sense but if we stay strictly within those boundaries there's not enough variety. ;)

[โ€“] jxk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] rbn@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago

Perfect - Castanea sativa ๐ŸŽ‰

[โ€“] Peasley@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

!Chinquapin!< is the best i can do without cheating

[โ€“] rbn@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Great! My image is a pretty small castanea sativa (sweet chestnut), while the chinquapin is listed as castanea pumila (dwarf chestnut). So for me (as a non-biologist) that's the same! ๐Ÿ‘‘

[โ€“] Peasley@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Thanks!

I'm from California where we have Golden Chinquapin (chrysolepis chrysophylla) which has fruit that looks the same, and leaves that are very similar (though with golden hairs on the undersides)

Looking them up, they are closely related to castanea. They also have edible seeds but the spiny shell is hard to get open.