this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
167 points (96.6% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

7725 readers
2 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Can everyone please pull back on the Despair of the Day, bottle it up tightly inside and just…shitpost, shitmeme or shitcomment while you’re here. That’s the tottering crayon tower on which NCD was built. This is not the place for discussing politics seriously or going through the seven stages of anything. Thank you.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 51 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Question: what if the goofiest most fucked up concepts accidentally align with the dark reality we live in?

[–] protist@mander.xyz 46 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Time for memes about the pending US invasion of Mexico

[–] cryptiod137@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Pfft that would never hap...

Orange filter covers my vision

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

my pico is de gallo'd

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Time for memes about the pending US invasion of Poland.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If they have any sense they'll do Cuba first. It's just way too easy a win for a fascistoid government that's willing to actually deploy and likes red baiting.

I'm not even clear what the guerilla situation would look like in the post-Fidel era.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 31 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I am so incredibly sick of hearing about US politics, so thank you for posting this.

[–] Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 months ago

I'm glad Trump is putting a stop to US elections so I can finally stop hearing about them

[–] Leeks@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

You're my hamdinger and you're bold.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

Push the button, Frank.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Mozingo@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Some people include shock and testing as stages.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Shock my testes?

Am I shitposting right?

[–] Mozingo@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I think so?

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If on the mobile app is there a way to check the sidebar rules?

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sync has an "About" tab when you're in the main community.

Should be something similar for other apps.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I can't find anything similar on Jebora. Honestly probably time to switch.

[–] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Rule nr 5 is kiinda bad, not a fan of that one. Everything is political, hell the rule "no politics" is a political statement

I think I get why, but then the seriousposting or like "no starting a flamewar" rules might be more applicable

[–] seliaste@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 months ago

Especially when military topics are political by nature

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sorry you don't like it. There are plenty of other communities out there or you can cultivate a new sublemmy in your own instance. Have fun.

[–] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's just constructive critisism 😅

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's also a legitimate question: what constitutes politics in the eyes of the moderators? That question cannot be answered without bringing one's own politics into the discussion. Is queer people existing political? Bigots would claim so. Besides, war is just politics though violent means, and satire should also always be political. So being strict on the "no politics" rule is next to impossible, and selective enforcement is often worse than none at all.

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Super, see above for my previous response in this thread.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think both @Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone and me very much care about this community and about how to improve it. Since this is a meta post by a mod, talking about the rules, I thought it's the best place to talk about what we think about certain aspects of the rules, and how they could be abused. This is not an attempt to start up drama or to denigrate any work done by moderators, but an attempt at conversation.

I'm not a fan that that is met with the suggestion to go somewhere else and create a new community. People have grown attached to this community, and I don't think anyone wins in this kind of all or nothing stance.

My apologies if a conversation about rules and their interpretation is not wanted here, but is there any other place to talk about meta topics like this?

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I see your point and it's well put. I assumed you were just trying to re-stir up drama between blahaj and NCD from last week. I should not have assumed that and you had nothing to do with that. I apologize for that and for my curt tone.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for the reply! I missed most of the drama, but yes, it was a mess and I can see why you'd jump to conclusions. I still think that rule 5 should either be removed/reworded or at least supplemented by some guidelines as to what constitutes 'politics', but I realize now this is neither the time nor the place to discuss that with the nuance it deserves. For now, I'm content with some very non-credible coping strategies for all the clusterfucks happening in the world. Thanks for the work you're doing for the community c:

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

You're welcome. That is kind of you to say.

[–] nuke@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yall can talk about meta topics in the matrix chat, rules are more lax there. But I should tell you Rule 5 isn't going anywhere regardless.

[–] exothermic@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

That moment when you actually look at a communities feed and realize every post in it is political in nature.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Question: what do you mean illegal in Canada? AFAIK the only extra laws here are already covered by rule 4.

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

The sh.itjust.works instance is founded on the work of dedicated volunteers based in Canada. SJW admins like @InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works might be better be able to answer your question. Our sublemmy is a guest in their house, in a sense, so we follow their rules.