this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
612 points (97.8% liked)

xkcd

12426 readers
24 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Link to comic: https://xkcd.com/2821/

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vigge93@lemmy.world 107 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I spent way too long trying to figure out why the guy and the ice cream shop were flying, and how he would move horizontally in he air...

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I couldn't tell what I was looking at until I searched for an explanation. All I could see was a person falling into some water past a floating ice cream stall. It's supposed to be a beach:

https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/2821:_Path_Minimization

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 24 points 2 years ago

"we have a beach at home"

the beach in question

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I just thought it was two dudes racing to get ice cream first.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I was more like: but if he choses the alternative paths, he doesn't get the ice cream - that doesn't make sense! Then I understood our priorities differ.

[–] ma11en@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Alt text.

Of course you get an ice cream cone for the swimmer too! You're not a monster

[–] teft@startrek.website 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Now I want to see someone swimming with a cone of ice cream in each hand.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

You want me to wear my swim trunks or get a bikini.. Warning before your answer: only one body type has the bouyancy to pull it off.

[–] Thisfox@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

As an Aussie, I don't see why that is unusual. You use your feet. But if it's only two icecreams, then you hold them both in one hand and swim with the other one. All I can say about this one though is that this is a very flat beach: Waves would ruin the icecream pretty bloody fast. Must be a river or something.

Do people not swim with icecreams in other countries?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do people not swim with icecreams in other countries?

Never heard of anyone doing it no, so probably not? 🤷

[–] Thisfox@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Huh. Stuff I never expected to be unique to Oz.

Swimming with something that can't get wet is not unheard of here. I sometimes swim a book over to somewhere to read, or a phone to a good place for a photo too.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

See, that IS completely unheard of here! If it's not supposed to be wet, we wouldn't dream of swimming with it!

I don't know if it's because you guys are born excellent swimmers like Norwegians are with skiing, but I don't know ANYONE who wouldn't assume that swimming with something invariably means getting it wet 😄

[–] anonymoose@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Thanks, was disappointed about no alt text 🙏

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 56 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It is simply polite to include a link to the original https://xkcd.com/2821 as per the Artist's desires.

Yes, I saw the explain, but that isn't to the actual origin.

Edited and added it. Thanks for the heads up

[–] 6mementomori@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

and I thought this had to do with light refraction lol

[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago

I mean, it kinda does?

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

It does: Light does not follow the path of minimal distance between two points, but the path of minimal time. This is called Fermat's principle.
Because water has a higher refraction index than air, light is slower in it and therefore takes a longer time to travel through it. Thus, it takes less time to take a longer path that spends more time in the air.
Fun fact: The underlying law of this principle is the principle of least action. This is the most basic law of nature we know of and can be used to derive all of physics.

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

So... Nature is lazy?

[–] 6mementomori@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd add to this that, if I'm not mistaken, it's because light takes all possible paths and the average measured time is longer

[–] crossover@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The probability of a path it takes is the sum of all possible paths. Richard Feynman uses this exact swimmer in the water example during one of his lectures of physics.

[–] set_secret@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

this was our first physics lesson in year 11 in the 90s

Who could've guessed that you were training to be google maps so early?

[–] BallzofFury@lemmy.one 8 points 2 years ago

Somehow he keeps on making awesome stuff, after all these years

[–] Jorgelino328@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Shouldn't the path that maximizes time have its line go through literally everywhere in the globe rather than just going around it once?

[–] GrimSheeper@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, but by then the ice cream has melted

We need a calculation using the speed at which ice cream melts and the max distance he could walk.

[–] nergal@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The path that maximizes time would just be going back and forth and not approaching the endpoint.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I feel it's a missed opportunity to exclude the ice cream sales and drowning deaths correlation, but that's just me. I like the maximal time route goes up, though.

[–] JazzAlien@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Thanks for reminding me that I have completely brain dumped all of trigonometry

[–] Jakylla@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If like me you can't see the picutre of the post, here is the original image:

revealxkcd #2821

[–] WndyLady@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What's up with that? I can't see any of the pictures hosted here.

[–] colforge@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I’m not positive but it might be due to the steps the Lemm.ee admin is taking to combat the CSAM uploads that have been happening and prevent the server’s administration team from being liable for potentially harmful and illegal images being hosted on their server.