this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

College Football

927 readers
3 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

Find your team's community

Join the Fanaticus Discord

/c/CFB Poll Top 25 Fanaticus
1. Oregon Oregon
2. Texas Texas
3. Notre Dame Notre Dame
4. Penn State Penn State
5. ~~SMU~~ SMU
6. Ohio State Ohio State
7. ~~Indiana~~ Indiana
8. Georgia Georgia
9. ~~Tennessee~~ Tennessee
10. South Carolina South Carolina
11. Arizona State Arizona State
12. Boise State Boise State
13. Alabama Alabama
14. Ole Miss Mississippi
T-15. Iowa State Iowa State
T-15. Miami Miami
17. BYU BYU
18. ~~Clemson~~ Clemson
19. ~~Army~~ Army
20. Colorado Colorado
T-21. Syracuse Syracuse
T-21. UNLV UNLV
23. Louisville Louisville
24. Illinois Illinois
25. Baylor Baylor

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One more round of F5 season in 2023?

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ToasterOverlord@fanaticus.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] wjrii@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Sensible. Jesus this country sometimes.

[–] goforliftoff@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

SMU? That’s an interesting and unexpected also-add.

[–] ToasterOverlord@fanaticus.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The fact that they can get them for $0 distribution for at least 7 years probably has a lot to do with it. SMU is in the rare position of having boosters with bottomless pockets that can make that palatable to the school.

And if you're bonkers enough to go from a cohesive east coast footprint all the way to California, you might as well also get a foothold in Texas for recruiting. Plus you get a major market (not like that is the primary factor in realignment anymore, but still relevant). I know people will say that's irrelevant as SMU is small fry in DFW, but they were huge when they were winning Nattys before their death penalty and I think they can get back there.

Really though, I think it would be a hedge in case they lose top programs (Clemson, FSU) anyway. They saw what happened to the Pac-12 when they didn't backfill after losing the LA schools.

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

Really though, I think it would be a hedge in case they lose top programs (Clemson, FSU) anyway. They saw what happened to the Pac-12 when they didn’t backfill after losing the LA schools.

It think this is the play, really. The PAC just got shot and bled out in the middle of the street. The ACC is at least running to find cover of some sort now that it finally realizes bullets are flying.

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

They've decided to lean into the rich frat boy stereotype and simply buy their way into the ~~P5~~ P4. Zero TV money for like seven years. It makes sense though, apart from obvious TCU objection, all the Texas schools and OKST would prefer not to add SMU to the B12.