this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
282 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

73567 readers
3102 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kias and Hyundais Keep Getting Stolen by the Thousands and Cities Are Suing | A viral Tiktok trend that began in 2021 demonstrated how the companies failed to install a basic anti-theft technology ...::A viral Tiktok trend that began in 2021 demonstrated how the companies failed to install a basic anti-theft technology that made them trivially easy to steal.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wander@yiffit.net 97 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It's worth mentioning that this impacts only US vehicles from those brands.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And only the key operated ones. Push to start are not affected.

[–] BitingChaos@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Push to start" may stop someone driving off in the car, but they are still targets.

Thieves smash the windows, hop in, see the lack of key startup, then hop out. You still will end making a call to the police or insurance company.

Having "Hyundai" or "Kia" anywhere on the car makes them a target of thieves, even with push to start.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 8 points 2 years ago

Nah, the proximity key cars have buttons on the door handle. It's a dead giveaway sign that it's pushbutton inside. Most thieves know this/figure it out real quick so they don't waste their time/risk getting caught.

[–] timetraveller@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

More needs to be said. Insurance companies have raised the rates of basic, liability only, for a salvage title car, by more than 70% increase in the last 3 years. $440/6mo > $770/6mo.

This is an attack on all motorists in a way I've never seen. Financially attacking everyone for two car models that have been designed to be targets of "model", and to allow children to make a mess of their futures.

What leverage can we possibly have against this exploitation?

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I hope it's the result of not using the metric system.

[–] yimby@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No, but it is the result of deregulation. Similar models sold in Canada don't have this issue because (drumroll please), federal regulations require immobilizers on new cars. Free market at work folks.

[–] jonne 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Are you sure? This stuff is happening in Australia too. Something about the key hole size being the exact size as a USB-A cable.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

That's only a small part of it. The bigger issue was that Hyundai/Kia removed like a 10 cent chip that would have prevented this issue on the US and a few other markets to save money.

Still, everyone puts the blame on Hyundai, and while they definitely deserve some blame in all this, let's not forget the fact that people are still actively stealing these cars. These are still scumbag criminals doing this. An average person could see a car with its doors unlocked and the engine running and they won't hop in and steal it, because they're not asswipes.

[–] Wander@yiffit.net 8 points 2 years ago

Here it says that this should not be possible in Australia due to the immobilizers.

https://www.drive.com.au/news/us-kia-and-hyundai-thefts-what-it-means-for-australia/

Maybe some thieves believe all KIAs and Hyundays are targets and eventually some are stolen due to other factors.

[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 61 points 2 years ago (2 children)

the companies failed to install a basic anti-theft technology

Failed to install or weighed the cost of not installing it and kept the profit?

[–] wildwhitehorses@aussie.zone 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Was it a requirement by law? Obviously not as this seems to be an America thing. So why not change the laws and mandate antithetical devices in cats

[–] DarkWasp@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

This is a law in Canada and to my knowledge these kinds of thefts aren’t happening here. This should be an easy fix.

[–] rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 years ago

Technically no, but standards do dictate that measures to prevent unauthorized use be present so I imagine those legal battles will be around that second part, especially with immobilizers being practically standard for every other manufacturer. Changing the laws will be a tough part, we can't even get reasonable automotive lighting laws on the books or enforced.

[–] 1847953620@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I also have to wonder how much it was fueled by the silicone shortage, omitting electronics in order to get a car out the door, as other manufacturers did (albeit in a smarter way, so not that any of this stuff exempts Hyundai/kia from criticism)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zzZombie@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I was one of the victims. My Hyundai Elantra was stolen. Smashed out the back window and ripped out the ignition to steal it. My insurance company has totaled the vehicle and paid me the value of the car. They totaled it because the thieves colored all over the seats and ceiling of the vehicle and the repair shop can't get replacement parts. I've started car shopping and I'll be damned if I buy another Hyundai at this point. Even though I'm seeing them for $3-5k cheaper than comparable sedans.

The most eye opening part was that my car was spotted at a McDonalds down the road from my work with the smashed window, and the person called the police. An office didn't arrive to the restaurant for over an hour and the thieves had already driven off. I think the police are overwhelmed with thefts, and the thieves, even if they're caught, are underage and released with a court date that they aren't attending. When I was at the impound lot to release the vehicle to the repair shop, two more Hyundais arrived while I was there!

On a positive note, I needed new tires and rear brakes that I'd scheduled to complete after my summer vaca so I can add that money to the down payment.

[–] Tsrich92@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Police don't care abkut property crimes against people

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 30 points 2 years ago

Against poor people. If someone smashes a Ferrari, they will be arrested in a matter of minutes.

[–] Dramachad@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Even though I’m seeing them for $3-5k cheaper than comparable sedans.

And why do you think the Elantra was $1K cheaper than a Corolla and $3K cheaper than a Jetta? 🤔

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It’s getting near impossible to insure Kias/Hyundais in some states now because this is so bad. I’d actually be considering buying one of their EVs or Hybrids if it wasn’t such an issue.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are insurers refusing all Kia/Hyundai or just the affected ones?

None of the push to start ones are affected, only the base model key operated ones because they didn’t install immobilizers on them.

[–] Poayjay@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

My wife has an affected model, but a push to start version. Getting insurance was fine. They did call to verify that it was the push to start before they finalized the policy, though.

[–] Blademax@lemmy.one 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There are other auto makes besides KIA/Hyundai, to be considered... that didn't overlook a "easy to steal with a USB" type problems.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you're trying to find a manufacturer that hasn't had some colossal/nefarious fuck up in the past, good luck to you because they don't exist.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Seriously wtf is with the state of cars today?

Or were they always shitty and we just never told people how easy they are to steal?

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Most modern cars have immobilizers that read the key and won't allow the engine to start if it isn't the correct key. Hyundai/Kia decided not to include these on some of their models to save costs. This was all well and good until it was discovered and spread across the internet. Now everyone knows these cars are easier to steal than others, with no easy way for owners to fix the issue.

It was security through obscurity, which is useless without the obscurity part.

Older cars up into the 90s were much easier to steal since you only needed to break the ignition lock or break the steering lock and touch the right ignition wires together. That's essentially what they're doing with these cars now.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Of course, I just really like the styling and price range on a lot of their newer models. I’m not seriously looking to buy right now, but if these problems didn’t exist they’d be the top of the list probably.

[–] Mudkipology@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

It's such a shame, I had a 2011 Kia Soul that was my favorite car I've ever owned (and notably not in the model years with the immobilizer problem). Unfortunately some moron crashed into me earlier this year and totaled it. My first thought was to replace it with another Soul but their reputation is so bad at this point that I had to go with something else. Six months later a Soul that I test drove is still sitting at the same used car dealership. No one will touch them.

[–] Tygr@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I recently shopped auto insurance. There are now policy carriers that refuse to insure Kia and Hyundai for a new policy. It has been one of the very first questions a rep asks so they can figure out if the call needs to be ended right away.

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Good to know. Hopefully sticking with my current carrier works...

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can't get them insured at all? Why wouldn't they offer liability, collision, and comprehensive (except vandalism) and just deny theft/vandalism coverage?

[–] Tygr@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Because they are being used to joyride, often causing property damage, wrecks to other vehicles and all that. The owner’s insurance is usually made to cover it even though they weren’t driving.

[–] Toast@lemmy.film 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I dunno about suing them. Lots of things are easy to steal. If there were a Tik Tok trend of stealing garbage cans, I might make an effort to secure the ones I have, but I wouldn't sue the garbage can manufacturer for not addressing the possibility of theft if mine were stolen. These cars do have some theft protection, at least to the extent that you can't accidentally steal them. Car owners should probably do what they can to deter theft, Tik Tok & YouTube should dissuade users from encouraging kids to steal, parents should be more responsible, and (not that it would necessarily help) all cops should stop being bastards

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The lawsuit is because those companies have done nothing to fix their issue.

If your phone caught fire if you put it near a magnet, you can't say "Well phone owners should be more responsible." And at some point, you have to say, "Why the fuck was this allowed to ship?"

[–] Toast@lemmy.film 1 points 2 years ago

Most cars used to be ridiculously easy to steal, and people dealt with this situation in a variety of ways. Suing the car manufacturers was not one of these methods.

I don't think your phone analogy is at all comparable. A phone catching fire during what anyone might consider normal use isn't the same kind of product design issue as a car that is no easier to steal than most cars were for most of the history of cars. The old covertible that I had years ago would have been way easier to steal than these cars, for example, both because of simple wiring and simple access to the car interior.

We can pass the blame for this issue around pretty widely. I don't think we should just pin all the blame on the car makers

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just got home to find out my neighbor's kia was stolen. Managed to get it back and catch the guys. But his steering column is busted now.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

... Batman? Did you bust the steering column with one of their faces?

[–] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Are the models with immobilizers safe?

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To the beet of my knowledge, yes.

[–] Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 2 years ago

To the carrot of my knowledge, I agree.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Yes and no. They're not as easy to steal, but they're more likely to be targeted by the car thief not realizing that it's the "wrong" model year.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Maybe just encourage the cops to do their job? Or at least shoot different people.

[–] Blademax@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They get PAID suspension for not doing their job right...

[–] shatterling@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago
[–] wahming@monyet.cc 2 points 2 years ago

Right? You wouldn't know it from the downvotes I'm getting above

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›