this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
1217 points (92.3% liked)

Science Memes

17293 readers
1777 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I had a dude come up to me at the reference desk and tell me that the earth can’t be billions (he said trillions, lol) of years old because erosion from the Mississippi River would make it wider and deeper than it is. I pulled up some info including the idea that the Mississippi was something that came about more recently because of plate shifting, etc and he just said, "Nah."

[–] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)

nO ThAT’s jUSt gOD tEStiNg yOuR FAiTh

🤦‍♂️

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"Whatever! Pssshhh!"

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The tragedy is that humans aren't convinced to change their minds by facts like this. They're convinced by good stories from their friends and family.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If uranium-238 can be Fused in a star why couldn’t lead be Fused directly and in tern all the elements in between.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)

The correct answer would have been: "Why should I? You're an idiot."

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This would mean that there was more uranium around millions and billions of years in the past so why isn't there any evidence of prehistoric nukes in the fossil record

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›