Programming Challenges

A bit late to the party but here's a Rust solution that is probably maybe correct: https://pastebin.com/Eaes7hU9

Very late, but C solution using fib: Git

#include 
#include 
#include 

size_t fib(size_t n)
{
	/* n=93 is the last fib(n) that fits in u64. */
	static size_t cache[94] = { 0, 1 };
	static size_t top_valid = 1;
	size_t a, b;

	if (top_valid >= n) {
		return cache[n];
	} else if (n >= sizeof(cache) / sizeof(*cache)) {
		fputs("Fib overflow\n", stderr);
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
	}

	a = cache[top_valid - 1];
	b = cache[top_valid];
	for (; top_valid < n; top_valid += 2) {
		a = cache[top_valid + 1] = a + b;
		b = cache[top_valid + 2] = a + b;
	}

	return cache[n];
}

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
	char *p, c;
	size_t combos = 1;
	int digits = 0;
	

	if (argc != 2) {
		fputs("Bad invocation.\n", stderr);
	}

	if (!*(p = argv[1])) {
		goto done;
	}

	for (;;) {
		c = *++p;
		if (c < '0' || c > '9') {
			combos *= fib(digits);
			digits = 0;
			if (!c) {
				break;
			}
		} else {
			digits++;
		}
	}

done:
	printf("%zu\n", combos);

	return 0;
}

Zig would probably be a good language for a solution if there is a known maximum number of combinations, since it has large fixed-width types and comptime.

So, I also realized its the fibonacci sequence for number of combinations of numbers. All I care about is counting sequential digits, we skip a character after every sequence. We just need to account for if the first character is a number and we are good. I did this in ruby. I didn't really try for anything bonus points wise.

Pastebin because formatting doesn't like & or <

My code also outputs 0 if the sequence itself is invalid(ends on a non-digit character, or has two non-digit characters in a row)

Given an input c, outputs the number of distinct lists of strings lst such that:

1. ''.join(lst) == c
2. for every string s in lst, s consists of an arbitrary character followed by one or more characters from '0123456789'

Sure hope I didn't mess this up, because I think the fundamental idea is quite elegant! Should run successfully for all "reasonable" inputs (as in, the numeric output fits in a uint64 and the input isn't ridiculously long). Fundamental algorithm is O(n) if you assume all arithmetic is O(1). (If not, then I don't know what the time complexity is, and I don't feel like working it out.)

from functools import cache
from itertools import pairwise
from math import prod

@cache
def fibonacci(n: int) -> int:
    if n == 0:
        return 0
    if n == 1:
        return 1
    return fibonacci(n - 1) + fibonacci(n - 2)

def main(compressed: str) -> int:
    is_fragment_start = [i == 0 or c not in '0123456789' for i, c in enumerate(compressed)]
    fragment_start_positions = [i for i, s in enumerate(is_fragment_start) if s]
    fragment_lengths = [stop - start for start, stop in pairwise(fragment_start_positions + [len(compressed)])]
    return prod(fibonacci(fragment_length - 1) for fragment_length in fragment_lengths)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    from argparse import ArgumentParser
    parser = ArgumentParser()
    parser.add_argument('compressed')
    print(main(parser.parse_args().compressed))

Idea: a00010 -> [a000, 10] -> [length 4, length 2] -> F(4) * F(2)
01a102b0305 -> [01, a102, b0305] -> [length 2, length 4, length 5] -> F(2) * F(4) * F(5)
where F(n) = fibonacci(n - 1) is the number of ways to partition a string of length n into a list of strings of length ≥2.

F(2) = 1 = fibonacci(1), F(3) = 1 = fibonacci(2), and F(n) = F(n - 2) + F(n - 1), so F is indeed just an offset version of the Fibonacci sequence.
To see why F(n) = F(n - 2) + F(n - 1), here are the ways to split up 'abcde': ['ab'] + (split up 'cde'), ['abc'] + (split up 'de'), and ['abcde'], corresponding to F(5) = F(3) + F(2) + 1.
And the ways to split up 'abcdef': ['ab'] + (split up 'cdef'), ['abc'] + (split up 'def'), ['abcd'] + (split up 'ef'), and ['abcdef'], corresponding to F(6) = F(4) + F(3) + F(2) + 1 = F(4) + F(5) = F(6 - 2) + F(6 - 1).
The same logic generalizes to all n >= 4.