this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
102 points (95.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

36473 readers
252 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Was getting ready this morning and the ending of MGS2 came to mind.

Plot

It states that GW was the only AI destroyed, and that the S3 Plan's real purpose is to control human thought to prevent society's regression in the digital era from trivial information drowning knowledge and truth in the belief that humanity is too immature to handle the flow of information responsibly

Though the villains in MGS2 seemed to have better intentions than the nation states / trolls that are flooding the internet today.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's been really disheartening to watch metal gear lore come true.

I hope I don't lose an eye

[–] blackluster117@possumpat.io 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Snake... answer me, Snake... Snaaake!

[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

He's dead.

I'm plissken.

Iroquois Plissken. Lieutenant Junior Grade

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You should listen to Senator Armstrong's speech from Rising and ask yourself if he'd get votes in today's political landscape.

I think he'd have a noticeable percentage of the voting base of America.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Standing here
I realise
You're just like me
Trying to make history

But who's to judge
The right from wrong
When our guard is down I think we'd both agree
That violence breeds violence
But in the end
It has to be this way

Raiden is 100% wrong about Armstrong approaching any of that situation in good faith. But it's a great song and Raiden became cooler when he accepted that he's allowed to do "bad" things to bad people.

"I told you that my sword is a tool of justice. Not to be used in anger. BUT THIS ISN'T MY SWORD."

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I disagree that Armstrong didn't approach that situation in good faith. I think he meant every word he said. Armstrong was a caricature of American Individualism and a diehard fanatic. If you watch his speech now, there's a lot in there that sounds familiar to modern politics. Including "they'll make America great again!"

He's a villain who comes off as a "might makes right" true believer. It doesn't matter if it's physical strength, underhanded tactics, cleverness, or sheer endurance. So long as you win, you make the rules.

He believed that the strong should squash the weak, while Raiden believed that the strong should protect the weak, and they both used violence to enforce their beliefs. In his eyes, neither of them were right. Who would decide the rules merely came down to which of them was stronger.

Raiden is Armstrong's beliefs made manifest. From surviving as a child soldier up to the very moment that he kills Armstrong, he's enforcing his will on the world around him through his strength. A shift in perspective, which side of the sword you're on, and Raiden's justice becomes the same as Armstrong's oppression.

This is the danger of a true believer of "might makes right." Because even when you beat them, you didn't prove them wrong - you merely played by their rules and beat them at their own game. Your might made you right, and nothing more.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 0 points 9 months ago

Drag doesn't think Armstrong is capable of good faith. Good faith means acting with a bare minimum of prosociality. Raiden thinks Armstrong would agree violence breeds violence. Technically that's true, but Armstrong doesn't have any problem with that. He's pure, unashamed evil. There's honesty, but no good faith.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 9 months ago

If they were right about that, then we should start looking out for vocal chord parasites that'll turn us into zombies.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 9 months ago

I have a coworker currently playing through that one now. I'm really excited for him to get to the end to see what he thinks about it considering our current circumstances.

Also: "I hear it's amazing when the famous purple stuffed worm in flap-jaw space with the tuning fork does a raw blink on hara-kiri rock. I need scissors! 61!"

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 9 months ago

Call of duty in early 2010s also covered fake news too... It sounded clown back then...

Oh boy are we here now