this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
171 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck AI

4102 readers
422 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 50 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Silicon Valley companies yet again deciding if they should involve themselves in affairs they have no business being a part of. Where the fuck is Congress?? Oh right, eating out of these fuckers’ platinum assholes.

There’s obviously no way this could ever go wrong, Silicon Valley companies always make decisions based on what’s ethically and morally best for everyone, so I’m sure they’ll make the right call.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Don't be evil... Oh wait...

[–] Damn990099@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

We could make more... Money...

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Tech bros: "But what if AI could have a little murder rampage, as a treat?"

[–] Digital_man@lemmy.one 12 points 11 months ago

Tech CEOs are privileged people who will do what ever and say what ever to make lots of money.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I love the idea of a fancy autocomplete trained on Reddit and 4-chan deciding whether or not someone should be murdered or not. Sounds like a fantastic idea.

[–] dch82@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago

Hmm, who would be on the list?

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

“Obviously not… but, then again… money…

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Speaking of things that are deadly, that mullet/soul patch combo in the preview is rough

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

At long last we've created killer drones from the cautionary short film "Slaughterbots".

Of course, given how jank what we've decided to call "AI" is if you tried to make a real Slaughterbot it'd probably be blowing up random people or patches of the wall that it thought looked like a face.

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Do not create the Torment Nexus.

[–] lonlazarus@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It’s time to get those parts to build an EMP.

[–] dch82@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago

Someone make a project called OpenEMP quickly so we save r&d time

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

SV: No, that would be unethical.

Armies: But we'll give you lots of money.

SV: Oh, yes then.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Don’t be evil.

Billions of dollars later.

Ok, do be evil.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

If it decides tech bros and billionaires are legitimate targets, sure.

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

They want autonomous weapons and they want AGI to save us from climate change. I don't believe AGI will happen but they'll probably settle for faking something that fools the masses and lets them set the agenda. Then it's flame throwing robot dogs for everyone.

[–] mydude@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

This is fucking sick

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Silicon Valley has no word in this. It's givernments who decide what kind of weapons they want for their militaries.

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Silicon Valley has lobbying money

[–] Shark_Ra_Thanos@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

If silicone valley has the AI and the AI has internet access you all are suckers for ever thinking you have anything. It's all gone. Bye!

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago

"What's a viable business model for all these idiot robots we keep building?"

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

Sure they are going to allow it for the reason that they will gain more money

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Stupid looking goon should be the one to go first

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

It already is

[–] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 months ago

Hack one of that automated turrets and change the promp sounds pretty easy.

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Implement Asimov's 3(4) Laws of Robotics.

[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Eventually? Maybe, but frankly Asimov had those rules for a reason. Now? It can't even decide what it said a second ago.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The current discussions of LLM and algorithmic learning being referred to as "Artificial Intelligence", is super duper frustrating to all us science fiction fans. There is no AI in the Asmiov sense, no one is even trying to make that form of AI.

Having said all that, and this is the coldest take ever. Robots shouldn't kill people.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

At best, LLMs are a small slice of a pie that would constitute an artificial intelligence.

I suppose you could look at this 2 ways: either, when we talk about the state of AI, we could say that, yes, we have it, but only this one small part that kinda works ok; or (the more traditional route) would be to say that AI doesn’t exist until all of the constituent technologies have been both developed and assembled.

Obviously, we know which one the marketing departments of many companies choose.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago

Ok so just imagine this guy doing a TED presentation ala Weyland in the first Alien reboot movie, and just splice that as the intro to the first Terminator movie.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Doesn’t matter because AI will be weaponized against the masses no matter what your opinion of it is. It’s the billionaires with the money and influence to make sure it becomes a weapon and they will 100% be beneficiaries of said weapons so OF FUCKING COURSE they will use it.

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Nuke Silicon Valley

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

I remember that show, maybe I should pick it back up

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The answer is no. But of course some idiot is going to do it and make the thing able to self replicate and fuel from "biomass".

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

ha ha ha, no way a farrow plague upon your house