this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
30 points (100.0% liked)

science

22803 readers
7 users here now

Welcome to Hexbear's science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Preprint of a new paper examining the material conditions that give rise to internationally recognized scientists just came out. The authors argue that if we were actually recognizing and nurturing scientific talent, we'd expect the family income distribution of Nobel laureates to be roughly normal (i.e. most Nobel winners would come from families with incomes around the 50th percentile). Their results very much do not bear this out: the average Nobel winner grew up in a household in the about the 90th percentile of income no matter where they grew up, with disproportionately large numbers coming from the 95th percentile and up. This strongly suggests that academic achievement, especially at the highest levels, is not a meritocracy, but rather limited by the material conditions of birth.

shocked-pikachu I know, but the size of the effect is really staggering.

Paper here

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Insert quote about countless potential geniuses dying in toil and poverty here. you-are-a-serf

[–] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 19 points 9 months ago

It's the epigraph to the paper itself, to their credit.

[–] courier8377@hexbear.net 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Honestly one of the most fundamental grievances I have with the world, human potential is so so so so much more than what exists now

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Just look at the richest and most powerful men in the world (yes, it's pretty much all men at the top of the top) and what fucking ignorant manchildren most of them are. That's supposedly our most meritous and productive bunch. my-hero

[–] courier8377@hexbear.net 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Kings Midas rule over us all, the telos of every system they touch is reoriented towards gold mega-rich-light-bending-guy

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Reality Distortion Field" was first used (outside of a science fiction show, anyway) for one employee to describe the effect that Steve Jobs had when he showed up and was being a gaslighting asshole in any given Apple office. He was definitely a particularly smelly dirty-fingernailed mega-rich-light-bending-guy

[–] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"I cannot stink, as I never eat meat and am enlightened. Showering actually makes you stink. I think you smell bad because you ate a hamburger and took a shower. Please excuse me while I scream at this 9 year old."

  • Rev. Stephan Jobes, Esq.
[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago

I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.

  • Stephen Jay Gould
[–] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 10 points 9 months ago

This reminded me of an exception to this which is the portuguese communist writer Jose Saramago, he grew up very poor and won the nobel prize in literature 25 years ago TODAY!

Here's a quote from when he visited Palestine

During the Second Intifada, while visiting Ramallah in March 2002, Saramago said that "what is happening in Palestine is a crime we can put on the same plane as what happened at Auschwitz ... A sense of impunity characterizes the Israeli people and its army. They have turned into rentiers of the Holocaust." In an essay he wrote expanding on his views, Saramago wrote of Jews: "educated and trained in the idea that any suffering that has been inflicted . . . on everyone else . . . will always be inferior to that which they themselves suffered in the Holocaust, the Jews endlessly scratch their own wound to keep it bleeding, to make it incurable, and they show it to the world as if it were a banner."

[–] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

roughly normal

Roughly uniform you mean? Most people aren't near the 50th percentile, there's the same number of people in the 45th to 55th percentiles as the 0th to 10th and 90th to 100th.

I know, but the size of the effect is really staggering.

Honestly, not really. I think it's less about wealth directly as it is about the overly particular academic path. I think there is high heritibility among professors because their kids get a much better idea of how to become a professor, and have a built-in network. There's probably a similar trend with lawyers and doctors.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 5 points 9 months ago

I hope the person who did this study gets an ig nobel.

Also I would love to see this same study done on ig nobel winners

[–] adultswim_antifa@hexbear.net 3 points 9 months ago

I would like to see the same graph for The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel.

[–] bumpusoot@hexbear.net 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

To be honest, you could replicate this same graph for everything and anything in life. To me personally, it really isn't news, neither is the size of the effect. Social mobility in western society is insanely low (and honestly not amazing anywhere). :same-graph:

However, this fact really does need to be hammered into peoples' heads: Even if you only care about meritocracy, capitalism is an awful system as we're clearly denying ~90% of potential achievers from achieving by allowing this kind of inequality. The wealth you're born into is the biggest indicator of success in life, to such an insane degree that it's borderline the ONLY indicator of your chance of success in life.

Even revolutionary leaders are most typically bourgeoisie-born class traitors. Turns out having food, education, stable family, reliable shelter and healthcare, and opportunities in life really, really helps.

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Holy shit. This is supposed to be a bell curve, and it looks like this. Grim.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 2 points 9 months ago

It is actually supposed to look like a uniform distribution as percentile-to-percentile diagram.

[–] TheSpectreOfGay@hexbear.net 2 points 9 months ago