People Twitter

8465 readers

1984 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1124

The value of x (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

139 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 3) 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

The angle formerly known as twitter

[–] sag@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

40 + 60 + 35 Godamn It's kids math.

[–] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

~~125 = 180 - (180 - 90 - 35)~~

Edit: Never mind I saw the explanation for the correct answer below

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Someone used “x” to mean the variable x on a podcast the other day and it made me wonder if Gen Z is happy to call eX-Twitter “X” and if they calls Tweets “posts”.

Annoying change for eX-Twitter

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Fidelity Values X Nearly 80% Less Than When Musk Bought It

[–] Cock_Inspecting_Asexual@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Heheheh the 2 triangles are having segs

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

For the love of dog, you can't solve this problem without making assumptions that fundamentally change the answer. People are too quick to spot the first error and then make assumptions that are conveniently consistent with the correction.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments