this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
79 points (97.6% liked)

Thanks, I Hate It!

783 readers
1 users here now

Not a hate community, just a community with strong dislikes of particular things.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

if this travesty is to be entetained, then at least let the hands be hands and make the creature run on the hooves and human feet.

[–] Podunk@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Oh my god you are right.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This reminds me, the other day I was thinking about putting the head of a human up a horse's ass in blender and 3d printing it to give to a friend with a sleipnir collection

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't reverse centaurs be bipedal?

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, I assume you'd still have the torso of a horse emerging from the body of a human... So, if you think about it, it makes most sense for the four legs to be on the ground (two human at the back, two horse at the front) while the arms in the middle are off the ground... I'm picturing excessive back arch to keep the arms high up enough to be useful.

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Like slightly longer front human arms?

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Regular length human arms, still on the middle two joints.. But now the front and back legs are on the ground. Like some sort of fucked up man horse centipede

[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago