this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
337 points (98.3% liked)

News

31410 readers
2838 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The world's first ovarian cancer vaccine could wipe the disease out, researchers have said.

OvarianVax is a vaccine that teaches the immune system to recognise and attack the earliest stages of ovarian cancer.

It's being developed by scientists at the University of Oxford.

The hope is that women could receive the jab preventatively on the NHS with the goal of eradicating the disease.

Experts have suggested it could work in a similar way to the human papillomavirus (HPV) jab, which is on track to stamp out cervical cancer.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago

Let's fucking goooo! People are just so clever. This is amazing.

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)

While the "full-blown timeline" for the vaccine being approved "might be many years away" the visible impact could be sooner.

Professor Ahmed added that, through clinical trials, he would hope to start seeing the vaccine's impact "in four or five years on the healthy population".

This is really exciting. I wonder if vaccines could be developed for other cancers using a similar technique?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

They will establish which proteins on the surface of early-stage ovarian cancer cells are best recognised by the immune system and how effectively the vaccine kills models of the disease in a lab.

Sounds like it would to me. Between this and mRNA vaccines, there's a lot of promise out there.

[–] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 10 months ago

mRNA research exploded during the pandemic. Several cancer vaccines for various cancers are being developed right now!!!

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 10 months ago (6 children)

This is great news. Yet, sadly, I am drawn to wondering who will complain about this the loudest. Will it be misogynists who say "they're not helping men with their cancer", or anti-vaxxers saying "this vaccine will actually CAUSE cancer"?

What about people who are both misogynist and anti-vaccine?

[–] lmaydev@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fuck em, essentially. Rather have cancer than a vaccine, that's their choice. It's not until it's a required vaccine that it makes much difference.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What about people who are both misogynist and anti-vaccine?

$10 says Alex Jones and his troglodyte cult following are gonna have a field day 😮‍💨

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Alex is a little busy losing everything he owns right now.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sure. He'll also drink large quantities of liquor and cry.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Absolutely.

[–] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

They don't get a vaccine. More for the sane people.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I knew it. Here come the sad sacks with the useless "this is good news, but......"

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm an academic working to analyse hate speech, with a particular focus on online misogyny. As bigotry is illogical, common features of communications of that hatred is stuff that is wholly made up. This include the idea that men are being short-changed by a medical industry which prioritise female health. This is factually untrue, in terms of gender differences in health outcomes.

If knowing about the truth makes me a 'sad sack', fine. Maybe being correct and 'sad' is more important than being incorrect yet happy.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Ok, good point. Yet, sadly, children die of cancer.

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And, sadly, sometimes parents refuse the vaccine that would help.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Good point. Yet, sadly, puppies sometimes get cancer.

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works -3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It’s a good thing we invented this straw person to have this whole discussion artificially when literally no one else was bringing it up. If we can’t find any monsters I guess we’ll invent them and do it anyway. 🙄

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh you sweet summer child. I wish I could live in your brain.

[–] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

They undoubtedly exist, but we shouldn't worry about what some troglodytic moron has to say about the issue.

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s a good thing we invented this straw person

So, neither misogynists nor anti-vaxxers exist?

I can find you evidence of men complaining about free period products. I am certain there will be men complaining that female cancers are getting cures, and not male ones.

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

They exist, are they here on Lemmy without artificially or “ironically” sharing their awesome hot takes? The world will never know.

[–] JATtho@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The billions that got pumped into vaxine research... The mRNA method has received a nobel prize. Before this we had no good way (or as safe) to pre-train the immune system to "if you see this (virus, etc.) again, raise the alarms". Now we do.

Edit: updated the wording a bit.

[–] wrishafffal@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman won the 2023 Nobel Prize in Medicine for their work on RNA leading to the COVID-19 vaccines (from Moderna and Pfizer)

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

is this the kind of thing we will never hear about anymore, or is it legit?

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

This is some pretty cool research but I already can't wait to see the 100k per vaccine price in the USA lmao.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Anti-vaxxers: hold my beer.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well, this is cancer and not some virus so at least they'll only slowly kill themselves after suffering, if they were to have to deal with this. It's not great, but silver linings, I guess?

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It actually completely reverses the dynamic. Anti-vaxxers are bioterrorists because most stuff you vaccinate against is contagious. It's assaulting a public health superstructure that everybody relies on.

But when they only kill themselves? 🍺🍺

Only leftover awful thing is doing it to their poor kids. Still every bit as evil, just with a massive reduction in scope.

Far, far more than a silver lining.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

They're calling it a vaccine. We all know what anti-vaxxers will do when they hear the words vaccines.

[–] IMNOTCRAZYINSTITUTION@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

i know it's a pipe dream but if i live to see the eradication of cancer i will truly die happy

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

"could wipe the disease out"

..."but won't, because thanks to Capitalism it will be non-affordable."

[–] mr_fuzzy@lemmy.ml -3 points 10 months ago

Yes, and probably destroy your uterus.