this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
663 points (98.5% liked)

People Twitter

7868 readers
1097 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago (4 children)
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This had to be done, huh? Lol

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Rule of Acquisition #9: Opportunity plus instinct equals profit.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Daniella Fetish sounds more like a name kink than a pen name.

[–] don@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is that Gates McFadden in the last one lol

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I’d definitely buy that candle if they sold them at Cost Plus or Bed Bath and Beyond.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So uhh, how do you know about these?

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

I, uh... I made these.

Finding the original book covers will serve as a questionable Google search in my impending subpoena(s).

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I believe the poet Roy Parker Jr said it best, "Bustin' makes me feel good."

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 2 points 10 months ago

And if you've got ghosts--freaky ghosts--he wants you to call.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

[Beverly Crusher intensifies]

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Let me just light my paranormal romance lantern"

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 3 points 10 months ago

I love this ghost just like my grandmother before me, and her grandmother before her, and her grandmother before her, and her grandmother before her...

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

Blazin’ Bev, darling.

[–] sgbrain7@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

Ghost fucker all the way baybee!!!!!

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago

This is how far the republican / conservative agenda will go .... they want to ban sex in this life ... because they'll know we'll go hog wild in the afterlife

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

Oh boy, it's not about ghosts, it's about werewolves aka furry porn.

[–] CityPop@lemmy.today 9 points 10 months ago

My daddy was a pervert and I'm a pervert’s son

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

pair o' not-normals.

[–] Maultasche@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

He's kind of a big deal there (one of the mods).

[–] TychoQuad@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A lot of star trek episodes are on the left, but there’s one episode of TNG which is clearly on the right.

[–] LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A Voyager two-parter also IIRC

[–] TychoQuad@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

???

I couldn’t think of any paranormal Voyager 2 parters. There were 2 that had a romance subplot, (Unimatrix Zero and Workforce) but I wouldn’t consider either of those paranormal episodes.

Maybe my memory is failing me, but there was definitely one that starts out with Janeway getting courted by an apparition (who later turns out not to be an actual ghost).

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Oh no. It's a whole genre?!

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ghosts aren't my thing, but I don't judge.

Unless they're Confederate Civil War ghosts, then I'm going to judge.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What if you, also, are a ghost?

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd sneak into the movies without paying!

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but would you sneak into a car?

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd have to think about that one 🤔

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

While you pontificate, perhaps you could enjoy this classic "IT Crowd" clip.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ha, fantastic! I really missed out on IT Crowd.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It's not too late!

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

See also: The Sims

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I'm over in the science section across the store.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Why not both?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As a strict monogamist, the only paranormal sex I'm interested in is if my SO turns.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Isn't this viewpoint why "until death do us part" is a thing?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm cool with my SO not parting after death, provided we can still get the romance on.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I typed a long message, then asked my wife what she thought about the concepts raised.

She informed me that you might be metaphorically pulling my chain.

If you are, well done! I was fooled. Though tricking someone as socially oblivious as I isn't that much of an achievement, I still appreciate the joke.

If you are not, I am happy to discuss the philosophies of committed relationships, but my (very inexpert) main points would be:

  • one should honor all commitments
  • commitments can be ethically renegotiated with the informed consent of all involved parties
  • at the end of the commitment (ie, death in this case), termination or renegotiation is also fair (even if the same commitment is the end result)

edit: corrected an individual word.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I was joking.

That said, I also have a religious belief in life after death, and that includes marriage, though I also believe we need to choose each other again in the next life. I didn't really want to get into that in a random funny post, but there you go.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

My sincere apologies to you for creating a situation that might have pressured you into sharing something private or that the context made you uncomfortable sharing. I thought people might be amused by me being informed that you were joking, but I did not mean to discomfit you.

Thank you for responding. If you would like to continue the previous conversation in private, please feel free to message me; and if not, please know I leave this thread with no negative feelings toward you.

edit: Added a word that hopefully made it seem less like I was blaming the other commenter.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No discomfort here. If I felt uncomfortable sharing, I would've just not responded. Since you gave such a serious response, I figured I'd do you the courtesy of giving a little more context to my original post (i.e. consider the pottery scene in Ghost).

A little more context on viewsIf ghosts exist in any meaningful form, I don't think they could have sex, nor is that something they would be particularly interested in. I see sex as a physical thing driven by hormones, and ghosts wouldn't have a physical form. My view of the afterlife is one of intellectual progress, not physical appetites, so marriage in the afterlife would be more based on companionship than anything.

So if my SO appeared to me after passing, it would be to warn me of something I'm doing that I shouldn't that could jeopardize our ability to be together in the next life. Or perhaps to encourage me to let go on my deathbed so we could be together again sooner.

I tend to leave religious views off my posts, especially in a community like this where we're mostly here to joke and have fun. So I keep my posts largely secular on SM, because I don't think religion is something that should be openly debated, it should be discovered through a connection w/ the divine, and weighed against scientific evidence (I believe God is subject to natural laws).

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

While I don't share your religion, it looks like our general views largely align.

I agree with your policy of generally not sharing religion or other similarly contentious topics here, but I appreciate that you made an exception for this conversation. Also, you taught me that you can label spoilers!

In case you're not familiar, some of what you said makes me think you might like the literary works of Terry Pratchett.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Oh, I love Terry Pratchett, he's fantastic. :)

And yeah, spoilers are great. I can be a bit wordy, so I use them to summarize my posts so people don't get overwhelmed by a wall of text.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

dont believe in them to start with although some spiritedness in partners might be nice once in a while

[–] bi_tux@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago